Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters.

J Invasive Cardiol

Department of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland, Pontiac, Michigan 48341-5023, USA.

Published: May 2010

This was a retrospective study of 144 patients with retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters inserted between 2004 and 2008 at a community/teaching hospital. The purpose was to evaluate the incidence of complications and the rate and success of retrieval. Retrieval of IVC filters was attempted in 14 of 144 (10%) patients at an average of 4.6 months. Retrieval was successful in 10 of 14 (71%). Within 6 months of insertion, retrieval was successful in 10 of 12 (83%). Unsuccessful attempts were at 3, 6, 8 and 9 months. Non-bleeding complications of IVC filters occurred in 12 of 144 (8.3%). Half (6 of 12) of the complications occurred after 3 months of insertion. Complications included IVC thrombosis in 3 (2.1%) (1 also had a new deep venous thrombosis [DVT]), a new DVT alone in 6 patients (4.2%), a new DVT with new pulmonary embolism (PE) in 1 patient (0.7%) and filter migration in 2 patients (1.3%). In conclusion, retrieval was attempted in only a small proportion of patients at a community/teaching hospital. Formalized guidelines for follow up may increase the proportion of patients in whom retrieval is attempted. Half of the complications of IVC filters could have been avoided with retrieval within 3 months.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ivc filters
16
retrievable inferior
8
inferior vena
8
vena cava
8
community/teaching hospital
8
retrieval successful
8
months insertion
8
complications ivc
8
half complications
8
retrieval attempted
8

Similar Publications

Two-year outcomes from the Cook IVC Filter (CIVC) Study.

J Vasc Interv Radiol

December 2024

Vascular Surgery, UF Health - Halifax Health, University of Florida, Daytona Beach, FL.

Purpose: Report 2-year outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study designed to further assess the safety and effectiveness of the Celect and the Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filters.

Materials And Methods: The BLIND study enrolled patients requiring temporary or permanent IVC filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary effectiveness endpoint was the rate of technical placement success and 12-month freedom from new symptomatic PE while a filter was indwelling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To identify risk factors for loss to follow-up after inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in inpatients of other departments (IODs) and to determine whether a quality improvement project launched at our institution in April 2022 improved follow-up and filter retrieval rates in these patients.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent retrievable filter placement at our institution between March 2021 and March 2023 were included in this study. Patients were divided into preimprovement (before April 2022; n = 81) and postimprovement (after April 2022; n = 77) groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To develop and validate a nomogram for predicting non-retrieval of the short-term retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters.

Methods: In this study, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors of short-term retrievable filter (Aegisy or OptEase) non-retrieval, and a nomogram was then established based on these factors. The nomogram was created based on data from a training cohort and validated based on data from a validation cohort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Inserting a VA-ECMO cannula through an inferior vena cava filter during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Int J Emerg Med

December 2024

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, No.87, Dingjiaqiao, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210009, China.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been utilized to treat massive pulmonary embolism (PE) accompanied by cardiac arrest or refractory cardiogenic shock. Our team opted for a femoral-femoral approach for vascular cannulation, using drainage and return cannulas in the common femoral vein and artery, respectively. However, femoral venous cannulation can be limited or challenging due to the presence of thrombus in the inferior vena cava (IVC), making the insertion of the drainage cannula via the femoral vein difficult.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Research on the use of prophylactic inferior vena cave filter (IVCF) placement prior to metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) in high risk patients has yielded conflicting results. We evaluated thrombotic events and mortality in patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) who underwent IVCF placement in anticipation of MBS.

Methods: We queried the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database for all patients undergoing primary sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from 2015 to 2019 with a history of VTE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!