A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Construct and criterion validity of the SF-12 health questionnaire in patients with acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina. | LitMetric

Background: The aim of the study was to determine the construct and criterion validity of the 12-item short-form questionnaire (SF-12) in coronary patients with either acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina in Spain.

Method: A total of 186 patients hospitalized with coronary heart disease have been studied. The construct validity has been analysed by means of the association between the SF-12v.1 and sociodemographic and clinical variables; and the criterion validity was tested by the correlations between 36-item short-form question (SF-36) and SF-12 summary scores. The equivalence between both health questionnaires was examined by means of the proportion of variance in the SF-36 physical and mental component summary (PCS-36 and MCS-36) scores explained by the 12 items adjusted by age and sex.

Results: The validation result was as expected: female patients and those with poor education level, worse mental health, unstable angina, cardiovascular risk factor and co-morbidity obtained a lower score in the SF-12. The correlations between SF-36 and SF-12 summary scores were high. The equivalence between the SF-12 and SF-36 was good, because the models explained 87% of the variation in PCS-36 score and 93% of the variation in MCS-36.

Conclusion: The SF-12 is a valid tool in studies assessing health-related quality of life in coronary patients. The use of the SF-12 may be especially useful in patients where the clinical situation make difficult the application of the longer instrument.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01161.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

criterion validity
12
unstable angina
12
construct criterion
8
sf-12
8
patients acute
8
acute myocardial
8
myocardial infarction
8
infarction unstable
8
coronary patients
8
sf-36 sf-12
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!