Traffic violations versus driving errors of older adults: informing clinical practice.

Am J Occup Ther

Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, Institute for Mobility, Activity and Participation and the National Older Driver Research and Training Center, University of Florida, PO Box 100164, Gainesville, FL 32611-0164, USA.

Published: May 2010

Certain driving errors are predictive of crashes, but whether the type of errors evaluated during on-road assessment is similar to traffic violations that are associated with crashes is unknown. Using the crash data of 5,345 older drivers and expert reviewers, we constructed a violation-to-error classification based on rater agreement. We examined the effects of predictor variables on crash-related injuries by risk probability using logistic regression. Drivers' mean age was 76.08 (standard deviation = 7.10); 45.7% were women. Of drivers, 44.6% sustained crash-related injuries, and female drivers had a higher injury probability (44%) than male drivers (29%). Lane maintenance, yielding, and gap acceptance errors predicted crash-related injuries with almost 50% probability; speed regulation (34%), vehicle positioning (25%), and adjustment-to-stimuli (21%) errors predicted crash-related injuries to a lesser degree. We suggest injury prevention strategies for clinicians and researchers to consider for older drivers, especially older women.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.64.2.233DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

crash-related injuries
16
traffic violations
8
driving errors
8
older drivers
8
errors predicted
8
predicted crash-related
8
errors
5
drivers
5
violations versus
4
versus driving
4

Similar Publications

In Lebanon, the lack of quality data on road traffic injuries (RTIs) led to the implementation of a hospital-based RTI surveillance system by the Ministry of Health in in private and public-run hospitals in the Bekaa governorate. This paper aims to describe the characteristics and severity of RTIs recorded over two years during the pilot phase. It also assesses the strengths and challenges of the surveillance system, highlighting areas for enhancement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Five-year trend analysis of drug use among individuals 16 years of age and older injured in non-fatal motor vehicle crashes in the US.

Traffic Inj Prev

October 2024

Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Florida.

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates drug use prevalence among individuals aged 16 and older who were injured in non-fatal motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) from 2019 to 2023, aiming to identify regional differences across the U.S.
  • Data from 19 states revealed a significant increase in drug use prevalence from 2019 to 2020, followed by a decrease back to 2019 levels by 2023, indicating a need for ongoing monitoring.
  • Although overall drug use prevalence showed no significant regional differences, the Midwest experienced a 4.0% lower annual rate of change compared to the Northeast, highlighting potential regional variations in trends.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects approximately 4.4% of US adults. ADHD is associated with high-risk driving behavior and costly motor vehicle accidents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Among motor vehicle crashes (MVCs), little is known about whether the characteristics and collision features involving drivers with epilepsy differ from those involving drivers without any history of epilepsy. We assessed MVC features and the effect of epilepsy diagnosis on the risk of severe crash-related injuries among drivers.

Methods: A total of 33 174 MVC events among people with epilepsy (PWE) and 663 480 MVC events of age- and sex-matched non-PWE (1:20) were selected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Administrative healthcare databases, such as Medicare, are increasingly used to identify groups at risk of a crash. However, they only contain information on crash-related injuries, not all crashes. If the driver characteristics associated with crash and crash-related injury differ, conflating the two may result in ineffective or imprecise policy interventions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!