Analysis of SM8 and Zap TK calculations and their geometric sensitivity.

J Comput Aided Mol Des

OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, NM 87508, USA.

Published: April 2010

AI Article Synopsis

  • A study on aqueous solvation energies utilized the SM8 and Zap TK models across various geometries, finding that CM4M charges from M06 and M06-2X produced comparable results for the SM8 model.
  • Zap TK calculations primarily employed AM1BCC charges, with some success using charges derived from DFT, while the OMEGA application effectively generated conformations that worked well with both solvation models.
  • The research indicated that higher levels of gas phase geometry optimization led to increasingly unfavorable solvation energies for single conformer models, which affected the accuracy of predictions.

Article Abstract

A prospective study of aqueous solvation energies was done using the SM8 and Zap TK models for a variety of geometries. CM4M charges calculated with M06 and M06-2X were found to yield similar results for the SM8 model. Zap TK calculations were primarily done with AM1BCC charges but limited attempts to use charges derived from DFT showed promise. The OMEGA application quickly generated conformations that performed well with both solvation models, while the use of computationally expensive DFT optimized geometries yielded increased RMSE and MSE. It is shown that increasing levels of gas phase geometry optimization yield increasingly unfavorable solvation energy for single conformer models.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-010-9355-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sm8 zap
8
zap calculations
8
analysis sm8
4
calculations geometric
4
geometric sensitivity
4
sensitivity prospective
4
prospective study
4
study aqueous
4
aqueous solvation
4
solvation energies
4

Similar Publications

Analysis of SM8 and Zap TK calculations and their geometric sensitivity.

J Comput Aided Mol Des

April 2010

OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, NM 87508, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • A study on aqueous solvation energies utilized the SM8 and Zap TK models across various geometries, finding that CM4M charges from M06 and M06-2X produced comparable results for the SM8 model.
  • Zap TK calculations primarily employed AM1BCC charges, with some success using charges derived from DFT, while the OMEGA application effectively generated conformations that worked well with both solvation models.
  • The research indicated that higher levels of gas phase geometry optimization led to increasingly unfavorable solvation energies for single conformer models, which affected the accuracy of predictions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!