Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Rabbit experiments indicated that resection of a half of the oviduct anastomosed failed to impair its function and reproduction of viable progeny. With greatly varying diameters of sutured pieces, the valuable anastomosis was made by additional cuts of the narrow end of the oviduct. Analysis of 332 case histories and morphological studies of 10 control and 70 pregnant tubes suggested criteria for selection of patients, for organ-preserving surgeries. The latter could be performed nearly in 50% of females with tubal pregnancy in the form of stomatoplasty or anastomosis. The results of the study were tested in 8 females in the clinical setting who all exhibited a full recovery of tubal patency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!