A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Plasma estrone sulfate assay in men: Comparison of radioimmunoassay, mass spectrometry coupled to gas chromatography (GC-MS), and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Estrogens, particularly estrone sulfate, play a crucial role in prostate cancer, with high levels linked to more aggressive disease, highlighting the need for accurate measurement methods.
  • Four methods for assaying estrone sulfate in men were tested: LC-MS/MS, GC-MS, radioimmunoassay after purification, and a direct RIA kit, with the first three yielding similar levels while the direct RIA kit reported levels three times higher due to interference and inaccuracies.
  • LC-MS/MS is recommended as the best method for clinical labs, while GC-MS offers additional benefits but requires further processing, and the direct RIA method is less reliable due to inconsistencies.

Article Abstract

Background: Estrogens are involved in the natural history of the prostate cancer and estrone sulfate, the quantitatively main circulating plasma estrogen in men, has been associated with an aggressive form of this cancer. A convenient and accurate plasma assay of this steroid has become important.

Methods: We simultaneously assayed estrone sulfate in the plasma of one hundred men aged 30-50 years, according to LC-MS/MS, GC-MS after solvolysis of E(1)S, radioimmunoassay after a chromatographic purification step, and a direct RIA commercial kit.

Results: Estrone sulfate plasma levels obtained with the first three methods were not significantly different. However, estrone sulfate levels measured by the direct RIA were three-fold higher than those obtained by the first three methods. We showed that the excessively high estrone sulfate levels obtained with the direct RIA kit had two origins: interference by high dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate plasma levels in men, and estrone sulfate inaccurate low concentrations in the standards.

Conclusion: The LC-MS/MS method can be considered as an optimum option for clinical laboratory. The GC-MS method requires solvolysis to estrone, but allows simultaneous unconjugated steroid measurement. RIA method, with chromatographic purification, is cumbersome, but less expensive. DSL-5400 kit yielded estrone sulfate plasma levels that were too high.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2010.04.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

estrone sulfate
32
sulfate plasma
16
direct ria
12
plasma levels
12
sulfate
9
mass spectrometry
8
estrone
8
chromatographic purification
8
three methods
8
sulfate levels
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!