Background: Groin pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total hip resurfacing arthroplasty can be troubling for patients and surgeons. Potential sources of pain include infection, loosening, metal hypersensitivity, or impingement of bony structures or the iliopsoas tendon.

Questions/purposes: We compared the rate of groin pain after THA or hip resurfacing using metal-on-metal to those of other bearing surfaces.

Methods: We identified 347 (334 patients) primary total hip (n = 301) or resurfacing (n = 46) arthroplasties. Complete preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were available for 282 hips. We retrospectively reviewed the charts for the presence or absence of groin pain at a minimum of 1 year after surgery with a specific focus on etiologic factors. The minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 14 months; range 12 to 24 months).

Results: The rate of groin pain was 7% (15 of 217 patients) after THA with conventional bearing surfaces, 15% (4 of 26 patients) with metal-on-metal THA and 18% (7 of 39 patients) with total hip resurfacing. Younger patients were more likely to report groin pain postoperatively and more likely to have metal-on-metal bearing surfaces.

Conclusions: Our data at short-term followup suggest increased rates of groin pain after metal-on-metal THA or resurfacing arthroplasty versus THA using polyethylene or ceramic bearing surfaces. The reasons are not clear but they appear to be associated with younger age. Potential factors include impingement, activity level and possibly higher expectations for patients receiving metal-on-metal bearing surfaces that may make those patients more likely to report postoperative pain.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2919872PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1356-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

groin pain
28
total hip
24
hip resurfacing
16
metal-on-metal bearing
12
bearing surfaces
12
pain
8
pain metal-on-metal
8
hip arthroplasty
8
resurfacing arthroplasty
8
patients
8

Similar Publications

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is frequently treated arthroscopically with osteoplasty and labral repair. Surgical preferences vary in terms of equipment, technique, and postoperative protocol. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools to assess outcomes across different institutions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recurrent groin pain following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a challenging problem. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the position and dynamics of the psoas tendon as a potential cause for recurrent groin pain following PAO. A total of 386 PAO procedures, performed between January 2013 and January 2020, were identified from a single surgeon series.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The effects of TECAR therapy on pain, range of motion, strength and subscale of HAGOS questionnaire in athletes with chronic adductor related groin pain: a randomized controlled trial.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

January 2025

Department of Physiotherapy, Iranian Center of Excellence in Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Madadkaran All., Shahnazari St., Madar Sq., Mirdamad Blvd., Tehran, Iran.

Introduction: Groin pain is a common issue among athletes. Adductor-related pain is known as the most common cause of groin pain. Although, non-operative treatments have limited efficacy, Capacitive and Resistive Energy Transfer (TECAR), can be used in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Association of Jumbo Femoral Heads and Acetabular Cup Position on Patient Outcomes after Modern Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty

January 2025

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Indiana Joint Replacement Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address:

Background: Use of jumbo femoral heads (≥ 40 mm) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) decreases postoperative dislocation, however, may leave patients more susceptible to groin pain. Limited data exist for the effect of jumbo femoral heads and acetabular cup position on modern patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study evaluated the effect of jumbo femoral heads and acetabular cup position on PROMs after primary THA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!