Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100225-01 | DOI Listing |
Med Phys
September 2021
Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel - Lahey Health, Burlington, MA, USA.
In an era of automated measurements and analysis, the time and resource intensive process of dosimetric plan verification for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatments would seem to be ripe for improvement. In this Point-Counterpoint contribution, the authors debate benefits of methods both hypothetical and established. I offer thanks to our contributors and note that they are writing in the classic style of a debate, the opinions that they argue may or may not reflect their personal views.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Phys
October 2014
Division of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-0547 (Tel: 713-563-2560; E-mail:
Med Phys
December 1999
Columbia University and The New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Department of Radiology, New York 10032-3784, USA.
It has been reasonably well documented that a pregnant resident physician can assume radiology rotations, including higher-exposure rotations such as angiography and nuclear medicine, without exposing the fetus to radiation levels that exceed national and international guidelines. Hence, many medical physicists support the contention that rotations should not be altered because a resident is pregnant. On the other hand, many if not most physicists subscribe to the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle, especially in cases of fetal exposure where increased radiation susceptibility is combined with an inability to decide for one-self.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!