Introduction: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a medical act that can be performed by nurses as long as they are constantly supervised by a physician. No initial formalized training course is required. The personal responsibilities of nurses and physicians about CPB have not been defined.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was: to list perfusionists; to evaluate the training of perfusionists; to determine which physicians are considered as in charge during actions performed by paramedics, as well as their qualification; to point out the changes since 1997.
Type Of Study: Professional practice assessment.
Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all perfusionists in activity in France.
Results: There were 71% of replies. We found an aging of perfusionists (median 49 years vs. 40 years in 1997), a fall in the proportion of trained physicians (13% of perfusionists had a training course in adequacy with professional guidelines, 25% of perfusionists said they worked with a physician who could intervene at all time, and 61% declared only one physician was in charge). There is no CPB referent in 26% of perfusion units.
Conclusion: An urgent need appears to define the respective responsibilities of medical and paramedical perfusion staff, especially as this technique spreads out of the conventional cardiac surgery operating theatres.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annfar.2010.03.008 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!