The promise of evidence-based medicine is to integrate the highest levels of clinical data with patient outcomes. After framing the question and identifying appropriate studies, evaluating their relevance to clinical practice is highly dependent on the instruments and measures selected to demonstrate outcomes. Currently, there are hundreds of outcomes measures available in the orthopedic literature evaluating these treatments, and it is not uncommon for different measures to produce conflicting results. Consequently, the ability to evaluate an outcomes measure is critical in determining the value of a specific treatment intervention. Similarly, selecting the appropriate outcomes measure for research or clinical purposes is an important decision that may have far reaching implications on reimbursement, surgeon reputation, and patient treatment success. Evidence-based orthopedic surgery is indeed possible, but demands a detailed understanding of why appropriate outcomes selection is important, the difference between clinician-based and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and potential future directions in orthopedics outcomes research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2009.11.002 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Clinical consequence of the 4-week X-ray control after ESIN osteosynthesis of forearm fractures in children.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Purpose: The absence of evidence based general guidelines for radiographic follow-ups of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with ESIN results in an arbitrary array of X-ray examinations. In most pediatric traumatology departments, an X-ray check is carried out 4 weeks after ESIN osteosynthesis of forearm shaft fractures to detect incipient consolidation of the fracture. However, the elevated sensitivity to ionizing radiation requires special precautions in the pediatric populations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF[Not Available].
Tunis Med
January 2025
Department of Rheumatology, Kassab Institute of Orthopaedics, Mannouba. Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia.
Unlabelled: Advancements in understanding SpA have greatly improved patient quality of life through early detection and effective treatment. However, non-specialist physicians often face challenges in identifying the early symptoms of SpA.
Aim: This study aims to assist healthcare practitioners in the early detection of SpA and to streamline management strategies by employing a standardized assessment protocol for adult patients with SpA.
Best Available Outcomes Evidence Informing Standard of Care.
J Orthop Trauma
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; and.
Although nonoperative management is the mainstay for rib fracture treatment, surgical stabilization of rib fractures is becoming more common. Recently, the number of high-quality studies on management of rib fractures has also increased. The primary purpose of this review is to analyze the currently available prospective randomized studies on the management of rib fractures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatric Supracondylar Humerus and Diaphyseal Femur Fractures: A Comparative Analysis of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer and Google Gemini Recommendations Versus American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines.
J Pediatr Orthop
January 2025
Department of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, including chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) and Google Gemini, have significantly increased access to medical information. However, in pediatric orthopaedics, no study has evaluated the accuracy of AI chatbots compared with evidence-based recommendations, including the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines (AAOS CPGs). The aims of this study were to compare responses by ChatGPT-4.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCost-Utility of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Spine J
January 2025
Hoag Orthopedics, 16300 Sand Canyon Ave., Suite. 500, Irvine, CA 92618, United States. Electronic address:
Background Context: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a common surgical intervention for treating lumbar degenerative disorders. Increasing demand has contributed to ever-increasing healthcare expenditure and economic burden. To address this, cost-utility analyses (CUAs) compare value in the context of patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!