The Institute of Surgical Research is the U.S. Army's lead research laboratory for improving the care of combat casualties. The Institute follows a rigorous process for analyzing patterns of injury and the burden of disease to determine where research can be conducted in order to positively impact care. These analyses led the ISR to focus research on: preventing death from bleeding; developing improved pain control techniques; developing improved vital signs analysis techniques; improving the treatment of extremity injuries; preventing burn injuries on the battlefield; and improving critical care for combat casualties. This process has resulted in numerous improvements in care on the battlefield. Highlights include development, fielding, and efficiency testing of tourniquets and improved dressings for bleeding control. Significant progress has also been made in the resuscitation of combat casualties using blood products instead of crystalloid or colloid solutions. Improvements in pain control include assessments of the effect of perioperative anaesthetics on the development of post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]. Novelvital signs analyses have been successful in identifying promising techniques which may improve the medic's ability to accurately triage patients. Current research in extremity injuries has focused on optimizing the use of negative pressure wound therapy for contaminated wounds. Burn research has focused on improving personnel protective equipment and implementing continuous renal replacement therapy. This research program is soldier focused and addresses care from self aid and buddy aid through all echelons of care. Many of these advances have been adopted in civilian medical centres as well, benefiting not only the military trauma patient, but also the civilian trauma patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jramc-155-04-17DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

combat casualties
12
institute surgical
8
care combat
8
developing improved
8
pain control
8
extremity injuries
8
trauma patient
8
care
7
combat
4
combat casualty
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Children are among the most vulnerable populations affected by armed conflicts, yet there is limited data on the preparedness of military medical personnel to care for pediatric combat trauma casualties in austere or large-scale combat operations. This study aimed to assess the confidence, training needs, and resource requirements of military medical providers who have managed pediatric patients during deployment.

Materials And Methods: This IRB-exempt, cross-sectional mixed-methods study used a survey created via a modified Delphi method with input from subject matter experts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Concurrent Surgical Care in an Austere Military Setting: A Preparation for Mass Casualty Events.

Mil Med

January 2025

Navy Medicine Readiness and Training Command, 620 John Paul Jones Cir, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA.

Background: The U.S. military utilizes small, forward deployed surgical teams to provide Role 2 surgical care in austere environments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Military-Civilian Training Partnership for Army Nurses.

Am J Nurs

February 2025

Joseph R. Danford is a medical student at the Tulane University School of Medicine in New Orleans, LA. Kayla Hearn is a military-civilian partner at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) in Nashville, TN, where Elisa Bickett is the military-civilian program manager and Bradley M. Dennis is director of military-civilian partnerships. Cynthia Barrigan is director of military-civilian partnerships in the Office of the Army Surgeon General in Falls Church, VA. Daniel J. Stinner is a military-civilian partner at VUMC and Blanchfield Army Community Hospital in Fort Campbell, KY. Contact author: Joseph R. Danford, The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Background: In 2018, the U.S. Army Surgeon General created the Army Medical Department Military-Civilian Trauma Team Training (AMCT3) program to enhance the clinical proficiency of medical personnel serving on Army trauma teams called forward resuscitative surgical detachments (FRSDs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In current and anticipated future conflicts, including large-scale combat operations, medical teams are tasked to provide prolonged casualty care (PCC) or extended patient care that occurs when delays in evacuation exceed the team's capabilities. Although the principles of PCC are often taught to military medical providers using simulation, educators rarely dedicate the time to training required to simulate the prolonged nature of these encounters. Therefore, a lack of knowledge exists regarding which aspects of extended care may be lost in an accelerated training scenario.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Future military conflicts are likely to involve peer or near-peer adversaries in large-scale combat operations, leading to casualty rates not seen since World War II. Casualty volume, combined with anticipated disruptions in medical evacuation, will create resource-limited environments that challenge medical responders to make complex, repetitive triage decisions. Similarly, pandemics, mass casualty incidents, and natural disasters strain civilian health care providers, increasing their risk for exhaustion, burnout, and moral injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!