A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 144

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3106
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Home parenteral nutrition in Scotland: frequency of monitoring, adequacy of review and consequence for complication rates. | LitMetric

Background And Aims: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) has been a major advance in the management of patients with gastrointestinal failure. It demands regular monitoring to ensure optimal intake, assess treatment response, and minimize complications. The Scottish Home Parenteral Nutrition Managed Clinical Network (MCN) produced a guideline advising three-monthly monitoring of biochemistry, micronutrients, vitamins, weight, and anthropometry. This study assesses the frequency and adequacy of monitoring of these complex patients and investigates any effect of this on complication rate.

Methods: All patients receiving HPN funded by the National Health Service in Scotland are known to the MCN via the National Contract for provision of HPN. Data are collected in an MS Access database; 2006 data is extracted.

Results: There were 141 HPN clinic assessments for 53 patients. Sixteen (30%) were seen every 100 d as recommended by the guideline. Sixty percent of reviews were within 100 d of the previous appointment. Duration of HPN treatment inversely correlated with frequency of review. Bloods were checked at 93% of reviews, weight at 86%, anthropometry at 24%, and vitamins and micronutrients measurement at 62% of clinics. No difference in complication rates was found between those reviewed within the recommended time periods and those reviewed less often.

Conclusions: Less than one-third of patients met the current recommended review frequency. Routine bloods and weight measurements were good, micronutrients less so; anthropometry is poorly monitored. Complication rates were not increased in HPN patients reviewed less often.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2009.11.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

parenteral nutrition
12
complication rates
12
hpn
6
patients
6
nutrition scotland
4
frequency
4
scotland frequency
4
monitoring
4
frequency monitoring
4
monitoring adequacy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!