This study examined the efficacy of a treatment, Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA), for individuals with chronic nonfluent aphasia of varying severity levels. With ORLA, the person with aphasia systematically and repeatedly reads sentences aloud, first in unison with the clinician and then independently. Following a period of no treatment, 25 individuals with chronic nonfluent aphasia received 24 sessions of ORLA, 1 to 3 times per week. A small, but significant mean change in the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Aphasia Quotient (AQ) was obtained from pre- to post-treatment. When subjects were divided by severity, medium effect sizes were obtained for all severity levels from pre- to post-treatment for the WAB AQ. Medium effect sizes were obtained for the severe aphasia group on the WAB reading subtests only, for the moderate aphasia group on the discourse measures only, and for the mild to moderate aphasia group on both the discourse and WAB writing subtests. Although more intensive therapy is preferred, individuals with chronic nonfluent aphasia may improve their language skills with low-intensity ORLA treatment, and differences in modality-specific outcomes may be anticipated based on the severity of the aphasia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1244952 | DOI Listing |
Digit Health
October 2024
Department of Psychology, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.
Background: Helping people recover from aphasia is among the top 10 research priorities relating to life after stroke.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of dubbing techniques (using newly developed software) for post-stroke aphasia therapy and explore its potential efficacy.
Methods: Randomised, crossover, interventional, feasibility trial that included patients with chronic post-stroke non-fluent aphasia.
Front Hum Neurosci
September 2024
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol
December 2024
Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, Lehman College, The City University of New York, NY.
Background: Persons with nonfluent aphasia (PWNA) use feedback from external agents (e.g., speech-language pathologists) and self-feedback to improve their language production.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAphasiology
July 2023
Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences Program, The Graduate Center, City University of New York.
Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that people with nonfluent aphasia (PWNA) improve their language production after repeating personalized scripts, modeled by speech-language pathologists (SLPs). If PWNA could improve by using their own self-feedback, relying less on external feedback, barriers to aphasia treatment, such as a dearth of clinicians and mobility issues, can be overcome. Here we examine whether PWNA improve their language production through an automated procedure that exposes them to playbacks of their own speech, which are updated recursively, without any feedback from SLPs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurol Sci
July 2024
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!