Conclusion: For otologic revision surgery, the advantage of the piezoelectric device appears real because it is possible to perform a 'blind' cutting of bone with fewer precautions necessary for soft tissues such as the facial nerve, lateral sinus, and dura mater.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of the piezoelectric device in revision surgery for chronic otitis media.

Methods: A total of 30 patients had revision mastoidectomy with previous canal wall up mastoidectomy. The piezoelectric device was used in all intraoperative steps. Before surgery and 1 month and 1 year after surgery, all the patients underwent the following instrumental examinations: pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem response, and electronystamographic recording.

Results: The piezoelectric device provided effective cutting, with excellent control and without side effects on the adjacent structures of the middle and inner ear (lateral sinus, facial nerve, and/or dura mater). Postoperatively, all patients had an uneventful recovery with no evidence of audiovestibular deficit or side effects. Among 30 cases followed for 1 year, 29 (97%) maintained a dry and safe ear. Intermittent otorrhea with perforation of the tympanic membrane occurred in one patient (3%).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016481003716536DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

piezoelectric device
16
revision mastoidectomy
8
revision surgery
8
facial nerve
8
lateral sinus
8
otoacoustic emissions
8
side effects
8
revision
4
mastoidectomy piezosurgery®
4
piezosurgery® conclusion
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!