Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We investigate peculiar dopant deactivation behaviors of Si nanostrucures with first principle calculations and reveal that surface dangling bonds (SDBs) on Si nanostructures could be fundamental obstacles in nanoscale doping. In contrast to bulk Si, as the size of Si becomes smaller, SDBs on Si nanostructures prefer to be charged and asymmetrically deactivate n- and p-type doping. The asymmetric dopant deactivation in Si nanostructures is ascribed to the preference for negatively charged SDBs as a result of a larger quantum confinement effect on the conduction band. On the basis of our results, we show that the control of the growth direction of silicon nanowire as well as surface passivation is very important in preventing dopant deactivation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl904282v | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!