Background And Aim Of The Study: It is well known that aortic root re-replacement presents a formidable technical challenge. Thus, the study aim was to describe the authors' experience with this high-risk cohort.
Methods: Between August 1996 and January 2009, a total of 26 patients (mean age 51 years; range: 16-72 years) underwent aortic root re-replacement surgery at the authors' institution. Previous aortic root operations included mechanical valved conduit (n = 9), tissue valved conduit (n = 5), Ross procedure (n = 4), homograft (n = 4), David procedure (n = 2) and Yacoub procedure (n = 2). The indications for surgery included endocarditis (n = 16), Ross procedure failure (n = 4), valve degeneration (n = 3), anastomotic aneurysm (n = 2), and severe valve insufficiency (n = 1).
Results: The reoperations performed were classified as follows: aortic homograft (n = 11), mechanical conduit (n = 9), tissue valved conduit (n = 4) and David procedure (n = 2). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 219 min (range: 101-398 min), and the mean cross-clamp time 142 min (range: 89-253 min). The mean ICU stay was 8 days (range: 1-45 days), and the mean hospital stay 20 days (range: 3-64 days). Four rethoracotomies were performed for postoperative bleeding or tamponade (14%). Two patients (8%) died within 30 days of surgery, and three (12%) required pacemaker implantation due to atrioventricular block (grade III).
Conclusion: Aortic root reoperation, even in the setting of endocarditis, can be carried out with excellent results. The major goals of this concept include a clinical examination and preoperative diagnosis, in addition to computed tomography to identify possible pitfalls during re-sternotomy. Care must also be taken to provide adequate myocardial and organ protection, by utilizing blood cardioplegia and individual selective perfusion techniques.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Langenbecks Arch Surg
January 2025
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH - 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Introduction: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI) is a critical condition and a leading cause of mortality in trauma patients, often resulting from high-speed accidents. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has developed into the preferred therapeutic approach due to its minimally invasive nature and promising outcomes. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of TEVAR for managing TAI over a 10-year period at a Level-1 trauma center.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Objective: We present our experience with endovascular Bentall procedure (Endo-Bentall) using a modular valve conduit (Endo-Bentall) in high-risk patients with aortic root pathologies.
Methods: The physician constructed Endo-Bentall device is composed of a self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve (TAVR), aortic endovascular stent graft (TEVAR), and two wire-reinforced fenestrations for coronary artery stenting. The TAVR valve is sutured into an appropriately sized TEVAR graft.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
January 2025
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery. Electronic address:
Objective: Over 30% of patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) are considered high - risk or inoperable. This study aims to investigate the early and mid-term outcomes of complex endovascular aortic repair of aortic root, ascending aorta, and aortic arch among patients with ATAAD.
Methods: From January 2018 to January 2023, 29 patients who were considered high risk for open operation underwent endovascular aortic repair.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
January 2025
Cardiology Department, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Port J Card Thorac Vasc Surg
October 2024
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, St Francis Hospital & Heart Center, Roslyn, NY, USA.
The optimal management of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains a controversial subject. While some surgeons opt for a hemiarch approach to minimize bypass and cross-clamping time, others prefer partial or total arch replacement to prevent the need for additional operations. The advent of hybrid approaches offers a variety of options to the aortic surgeon in treating ATAAD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!