Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We compared the spatio-temporal postural organization between stroke patients and healthy controls in a bipedal standing task where participants had to intentionally produce two specific ankle/hip coordination patterns: in-phase and anti-phase. The pattern to reproduce was visually represented by a ankle-hip Lissajous figure, and a real-time biofeedback displayed the current coordination sur-imposed to the expected coordination. Contrary to the healthy participants who were successful at reproducing the two patterns, stroke patients were unable to produce the in-phase pattern. In addition, when the anti-phase pattern was required, a reduction of stability was observed for the stroke group. The impairment of postural capacities following stroke was thus accompanied by a disappearance of one of the two preferred patterns found in healthy participants, a result that have consequences for understanding the etiology of postural pattern formation and the elaboration of rehabilitation programs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.03.004 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!