A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

High recovery of mesenchymal progenitor cells with non-density gradient separation of human bone marrow. | LitMetric

Background Aims: Bone marrow (BM) is the most used source of hemopoietic stem cells (HSC) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) in both hematologic settings and regenerative medicine. We compared the feasibility and reproducibility of two gravity separation techniques, with or without the use of a density gradient, in terms of both hematopoietic and mesenchymal human BM progenitors.

Methods: A total of 16 BM samples was processed to obtain mononuclear cells (MNC) and buffy coats (BC). The efficiency of the two procedures was evaluated by recovery of white blood cells (WBC), MNC and CD34(+) cells, clonogenic assays, red blood cell (RBC) depletion, cell viability, expression of embryonic transcriptional regulators and MSC assessment.

Results: The two procedures yielded a comparable recovery of HSC. Non-density gradient separation (NDGS) of BM resulted in four times higher MSC recovery and higher expression of embryonic stem cell markers (Nanog and Sox2) compared with density-gradient separation (DGS). MSC derived from both procedures was comparable in terms of phenotype, differentiation and proliferation potential.

Conclusions: NDGS is less time consuming, provides a better MSC enrichment and appears to be a suitable cell preparation method for clinical applications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14653241003709660DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-density gradient
8
gradient separation
8
bone marrow
8
expression embryonic
8
cells
6
msc
5
high recovery
4
recovery mesenchymal
4
mesenchymal progenitor
4
progenitor cells
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!