Aims: Right ventricular apical pacing can have deleterious effects and the His bundle has been widely reported to be an alternative site. This paper presents our experience with permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP).
Methods And Results: Patients referred for pacemaker implants (regardless of block type) were screened to determine if temporary HBP corrected conduction dysfunctions (threshold < or =2.5 V for 1 ms) and provided infra-Hisian 1:1 conduction of at least 120 s/m. Of the 182 patients selected, HBP corrected conduction dysfunctions in 133 (73%) patients, 42 (32%) of whom were rejected for the permanent procedure due to high thresholds. His-bundle lead implantation was attempted in the remaining 91 patients and was successful in 59 (65% of all attempts, 44% of all possible cases).
Conclusion: In some patients, permanent HBP may be an alternative to right ventricular apical pacing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq038 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!