AI Article Synopsis
- A multilaboratory study was conducted to compare the Assurance GDS for Salmonella detection method with traditional Reference culture methods across six different food types.
- Seventeen laboratories in the U.S. and Canada participated, analyzing foods with both low and high microbial loads.
- The study found no significant differences in detection results between the two methods for most foods, but the Assurance GDS method was more effective for detecting Salmonella in pasta samples.
Article Abstract
A multilaboratory collaborative study was conducted to compare the detection of Salmonella by the Assurance GDS for Salmonella method and the Reference culture methods. Six foods, representing a variety of low microbial and high microbial load foods were analyzed. Seventeen laboratories in the United States and Canada participated in this study. No statistical differences (P < 0.05) were observed between the Assurance GDS for Salmonella and the Reference culture methods for any inoculation level of any food type or naturally contaminated food, except for pasta, for which the Assurance GDS method had a higher number of confirmed test portions for Salmonella compared to the Reference method.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!