Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: We conducted a study of participants' abilities to place a laparoscopic port for in vivo biosensor use. Biosensors have physical limitations that make port placement crucial to proper data collection. A new port placement algorithm enabled evaluation of port locations, using segmented patient data in a virtual environment.
Methods: Port placement scoring algorithms were integrated into an image-guided surgery system. Virtual test scenes were created to evaluate various scenarios encountered during biosensor use. Participants were scored based on their ability to choose a port location from which points of interest could be scanned with a biosensor. Participants' scores were also compared to those of a port placement algorithm.
Results: The port placement algorithm consistently outscored participants by 10-25%. Participants were inconsistent from trial to trial and from participant to participant.
Conclusion: Port placement for biosensor procedures could be improved through training or augmentation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcs.300 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!