A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of respiratory tract infections in general practice: a modified Delphi study. | LitMetric

Quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of respiratory tract infections in general practice: a modified Delphi study.

Scand J Prim Health Care

Audit Project Odense, Research Unit for General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Published: March 2010

Objective: To develop a set of quality indicators focusing on the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory tract infections in general practice.

Design: A modified 2-round Delphi study.

Setting: General practice.

Subjects: A panel of 27 experts (13 countries) comprising mainly general practitioners, clinical microbiologists, and clinical pharmacologists were asked to rate the relevance of 59 quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of respiratory tract infections with regard to reducing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient health. A thorough literature review was carried out to ensure that all potential quality indicators were considered.

Outcome: Consensus for a quality indicator was reached if > or =75% of experts scored the item > or =5 on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (=completely disagree) through 4 (=uncertain) to 7 (=completely agree).

Results: A 96% response rate was achieved in both Delphi rounds. A total of 41 of the proposed 59 quality indicators attained consensus. None of the quality indicators focusing on the diagnostic process achieved consensus. Consensus was attained for 14 quality indicators focusing on the decision regarding antibiotic treatment and for 27 quality indicators focusing on the choice of antibiotics.

Conclusion: This study resulted in a final set of 41 quality indicators concerning respiratory tract infections in general practice. These quality indicators may be used to strengthen general practitioners' focus on their management of patients with respiratory tract infections and to identify where it is possible to make improvements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440613PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813431003602724DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality indicators
40
respiratory tract
20
tract infections
20
indicators focusing
16
diagnosis treatment
12
treatment respiratory
12
infections general
12
quality
11
indicators
9
indicators diagnosis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!