Why are natural sounds detected faster than pips?

J Acoust Soc Am

Department of Physiology, Centre for the Neural Basis of Hearing, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom.

Published: March 2010

Simple reaction times (RTs) were used to measure differences in processing time between natural animal sounds and artificial sounds. When the artificial stimuli were sequences of short tone pulses, the animal sounds were detected faster than the artificial sounds. The animal sounds were then compared with acoustically modified versions (white noise modulated by the temporal envelope of the animal sounds). No differences in RTs were observed between the animal sounds and their modified counterparts. These results show that the fast detection observed for natural sounds, in the present task, could be explained by their acoustic properties.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3310196DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

animal sounds
20
natural sounds
8
sounds detected
8
detected faster
8
sounds
8
sounds artificial
8
artificial sounds
8
animal
5
faster pips?
4
pips? simple
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!