Medical versus surgical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD.

Published: March 2010

Background: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common condition with up to 20% of patients from Westernised countries experiencing heartburn, reflux or both intermittently. It is unclear whether medical or surgical (laparoscopic fundoplication) management is the most clinically and cost-effective treatment for controlling GORD.

Objectives: To compare the effects of medical management versus laparoscopic fundoplication surgery on health-related and GORD-specific quality of life (QOL) in adults with GORD.

Search Strategy: We searched CENTRAL (Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2009) and EMBASE (1980 to May 2009). We handsearched conference abstracts and reference lists from published trials to identify further trials. We contacted experts in the field for relevant unpublished material.

Selection Criteria: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing medical management with laparoscopic fundoplication surgery.

Data Collection And Analysis: Two authors independently extracted data from articles identified for inclusion and assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials. Primary outcomes were: health-related and GORD-specific QOL, heartburn, regurgitation and dysphagia.

Main Results: Four trials were included with a total of 1232 randomised participants. Health-related QOL was reported by four studies although data were combined using fixed-effect models for two studies (Anvari 2006; REFLUX Trial 2008). There were statistically significant improvements in health-related QOL at three months and one year after surgery compared to medical therapy (mean difference (MD) SF36 general health score -5.23, 95% CI -6.83 to -3.62; I(2) = 0%). All four studies reported significant improvements in GORD-specific QOL after surgery compared to medical therapy although data were not combined. There is evidence to suggest that symptoms of heartburn, reflux and bloating are improved after surgery compared to medical therapy, but a small proportion of participants have persistent postoperative dysphagia. Overall rates of postoperative complications were low but surgery is not without risk and postoperative adverse events occurred although they were uncommon. The costs of surgery are considerably higher than the cost of medical management although data are based on the first year of treatment therefore the cost and side effects associated with long-term treatment of chronic GORD need to be considered.

Authors' Conclusions: There is evidence that laparoscopic fundoplication surgery is more effective than medical management for the treatment of GORD at least in the short to medium term. Surgery does carry some risk and whether the benefits of surgery are sustained in the long term remains uncertain. Treatment decisions for GORD should be based on patient and surgeon preference.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003243.pub2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic fundoplication
16
medical management
16
surgery compared
12
compared medical
12
medical therapy
12
medical
9
surgery
9
gastro-oesophageal reflux
8
reflux disease
8
disease gord
8

Similar Publications

The utilization of transthoracic approaches for the repair of large hiatus hernias remains a topic of clinical debate. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and recovery metrics for transthoracic hiatal hernia repair. A literature search was conducted using the key terms "hiatus hernia," "thoracotomy," "thoracic approach," and "Belsey Mark IV.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Minimally invasive hiatal hernia (HH) repair is the gold standard for correcting mechanical defects of the crural diaphragm due to its safety and favorable clinical outcomes (i.e., relief of patient symptoms).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

One of the most common gastrointestinal diseases is esophageal hiatal hernia. It is the third most common disease after peptic ulcer and cholecystitis. We present surgical treatment of a patient with fixed axial cardiofundal hiatal hernia and previous laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hiatal hernia (HH), or type I paraoesophageal hernias (PEH), can commonly be grouped along with types II-IV PEHs. The fundamental operation performed for repair is similar for all types. We question whether the clinical outcomes following surgical repair differ.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus and depending on its type, esophageal tubular hypo- or hypermotility can cause typical symptoms, such as dysphagia, chest pain, weight loss, or regurgitation. Clinical symptoms during initial diagnosis as well as over the course of therapy can be measured by the Eckardt score. Diagnostics include high-resolution manometry (HR manometry), (timed barium) esophagogram, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, multiple rapid swallow response, and Endo-FLIP measurement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!