Multicenter clinical research involves parallel Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviews based on the premise that local review reflects aspects of the research environment. We examined the costs and effects of local IRB review of the consent and protocol in a multicenter clinical trial in Parkinson disease. Seventy-six percent of changes to the consent reflected standard institutional language, with no substantive changes to the protocol. The costs of this process exceeded $100,000. These findings support initiatives by the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to facilitate centralized reviews. This may be an opportune time for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) to adopt a central review model.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848288PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.21831DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

institutional review
8
review board
8
board irb
8
irb review
8
multicenter clinical
8
review
6
local
5
local institutional
4
review multicenter
4
multicenter trial
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!