Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: Low uptake of metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in patients with heart failure generally indicates poor prognosis. Our objective was to determine the best method for calculating I-123 MIBG uptake. MIBG uptake as a percentage of the injected dose is presented as an alternative method for serial assessment.
Methods: Patients with chronic heart failure were imaged with I-123 MIBG with both a medium-energy (ME) collimator and a low-energy high-sensitivity (LEHS) collimator. Scatter correction was used to correct the LEHS images. Heart-to-mediastinal (H/M) ratio and the percentage of myocardial uptake of MIBG were obtained.
Results: Mean H/M ratios for the ME images, LEHS images and scatter-corrected LEHS images were 2.45+/-0.61, 2.22+/-0.47 and 2.51+/-0.62, respectively. Mean H/M ratio was significantly different among all the three sets (P<0.001) of images. The average difference in H/M ratios between the ME images and LEHS images was lower when scatter correction was applied (4.95% vs. 9.79%). The error in calculating the myocardial uptake as a percentage of the injected dose was significantly lower than the error in calculating H/M ratio (0.2 vs.10.2% LEHS; 0.3 vs.16.0% ME; 0.2 vs.11.8% LEHS scatter corrected).
Conclusion: For quantitative assessment of H/M ratio in I-123 MIBG imaging a LEHS collimator can be used in place of a ME collimator to achieve better counting statistics, but scatter correction must be used. The calculation of the myocardial uptake as a percentage of the injected dose has potential as an alternative method of measurement, particularly for serial assessment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283375639 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!