A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

I-123 MIBG cardiac uptake measurements: limitations of collimator choice and scatter correction in the clinical context. | LitMetric

Objective: Low uptake of metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in patients with heart failure generally indicates poor prognosis. Our objective was to determine the best method for calculating I-123 MIBG uptake. MIBG uptake as a percentage of the injected dose is presented as an alternative method for serial assessment.

Methods: Patients with chronic heart failure were imaged with I-123 MIBG with both a medium-energy (ME) collimator and a low-energy high-sensitivity (LEHS) collimator. Scatter correction was used to correct the LEHS images. Heart-to-mediastinal (H/M) ratio and the percentage of myocardial uptake of MIBG were obtained.

Results: Mean H/M ratios for the ME images, LEHS images and scatter-corrected LEHS images were 2.45+/-0.61, 2.22+/-0.47 and 2.51+/-0.62, respectively. Mean H/M ratio was significantly different among all the three sets (P<0.001) of images. The average difference in H/M ratios between the ME images and LEHS images was lower when scatter correction was applied (4.95% vs. 9.79%). The error in calculating the myocardial uptake as a percentage of the injected dose was significantly lower than the error in calculating H/M ratio (0.2 vs.10.2% LEHS; 0.3 vs.16.0% ME; 0.2 vs.11.8% LEHS scatter corrected).

Conclusion: For quantitative assessment of H/M ratio in I-123 MIBG imaging a LEHS collimator can be used in place of a ME collimator to achieve better counting statistics, but scatter correction must be used. The calculation of the myocardial uptake as a percentage of the injected dose has potential as an alternative method of measurement, particularly for serial assessment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283375639DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

i-123 mibg
12
lehs images
12
scatter correction
8
heart failure
8
mibg uptake
8
uptake mibg
8
h/m ratio
8
uptake
5
mibg
5
mibg cardiac
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!