Objective: To assess the ability of radiographers to identify abnormal radiographs of patients attending accident and emergency departments.

Design: Prospective study over six weeks.

Setting: Teaching hospital casualty x ray department.

Patients: 3394 consecutive patients referred for radiography.

Interventions: Radiographs were assessed by radiographers who were offered a four point triage scheme: normal, abnormal, insignificantly abnormal, or further advice required.

Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of radiographers' assessments with an assessment made independently by the reporting radiologists.

Results: Overall disagreement between the radiographers and radiologists was 9.4%. There were 7% false positives and 14% false negatives. Most errors occurred in assessing radiographs of the skull, facial bones, chest, abdomen, and soft tissues.

Conclusion: Unselected radiographers can offer useful advice on radiographs to casualty officers, but their high rate of false positive diagnoses indicates that they cannot triage casualty radiographs sufficiently accurately to allow them to extend their current reporting role.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1669393PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.302.6776.568DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

accident emergency
8
radiographs
5
well radiographers
4
radiographers triage
4
triage ray
4
ray films
4
films accident
4
emergency departments?
4
departments? objective
4
objective assess
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!