Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technology.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol

Boston IVF, Waltham and Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02130, USA.

Published: June 2010

Purpose Of Review: Despite the promising success rates of IVF, many couples have to undergo several cycles before achieving live birth. In counseling patients faced with subfertility, it is important to provide cumulative live-birth rates. This review evaluates the current knowledge on cumulative rates, summarizing recently published evidence.

Recent Findings: Existing data have been mostly presented in the form of live-birth rates per IVF cycle as a function of maternal age or reason for subfertility. Recent publications have been reporting IVF success rates in terms of cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR) per woman, thus providing a more realistic estimate that becomes applicable to individual couples. In general, CLBR following IVF has been reported between 45 and 55%. Maternal age has been shown to significantly reduce these rates, as has preimplantation genetic diagnosis. On the contrary, techniques mostly used to decrease the chance of multiple births, such as elective single embryo transfer and natural cycle IVF, do not affect CLBR while achieving a significant reduction in the rates of multiples.

Summary: Couples should be counseled that CLBR following IVF lies mostly around 50% and that maternal age as well as genetics of transferred embryos remain factors that influence success.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e328338493fDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cumulative live-birth
12
live-birth rates
12
maternal age
12
rates
8
success rates
8
rates ivf
8
clbr ivf
8
ivf
6
cumulative
4
rates assisted
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: This study investigated the impact of the carrier on transferable blastocyst rate and live birth outcomes in couples with structural chromosomal abnormalities.

Methods: Couples were grouped into reciprocal translocation, Robertsonian translocation, or inversions groups, and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) was conducted, and pregnancy outcomes were compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The blastocyst-stage embryo has been considered more advantageous for increasing the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) at fresh embryo transfer (ET) compared to the cleavage-stage embryo. However, it remains uncertain whether this advantage extends to specialized subpopulations, such as women with thin endometrium (TE), who are characteristic of impaired endometrial receptivity. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the difference in the CLBR between cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos at fresh ET specifically in women with TE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Biosimilars versus the originator of follitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hum Reprod

December 2024

Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Study Question: Is the probability of pregnancy different between women using biosimilars versus the originator of follitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in ART?

Summary Answer: Meta-analysis of eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) suggests that live birth, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates are significantly lower with biosimilars of follitropin alfa compared to the originator.

What Is Known Already: All biosimilars of follitropin alfa have received regulatory approval by demonstrating non-inferiority in the number of retrieved oocytes compared to the originator. Nevertheless, the most clinically relevant outcome in ART for both clinicians and patients is live birth.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Increasing the cumulative live birth rate : low-grade blastocysts, potential overlook].

Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol

December 2024

Service de Médecine et Biologie de la reproduction, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, 371, avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34090 Montpellier cedex 5, France. Electronic address:

It is now widely recognized that, following prolonged culture, the transfer of a high-quality morphologically graded blastocyst is the preferred strategy in embryo transfer. Low-grade blastocysts are often considered to have a low implantation potential, and their use remains highly limited. We conducted a general review of the literature, including publications from August 2017 to October 2023, to assess the current state of knowledge regarding these embryos, which are generally excluded in routine practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of changing the insemination method in women who experienced poor embryonic development during the preceding cycle. A total of 15,886 conventional IVF in 9,311 women, performed between August 2015 and June 2023, were included in this study. Of these, 270 couples experienced IVF failure due to poor embryonic development in the first oocyte retrieval (OR) cycle, which was cancelled before transfer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!