Cyclosporine A (CsA) is widely used after organ transplantation. Its narrow therapeutic window and large pharmacokinetic variability makes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) demanding and frequent dose adjustments are needed, especially early after transplantation. The aim of the present pilot study was to compare accuracy of CsA TDM by experienced clinicians against a computer-assisted dosing model. Renal transplant recipients on CsA, prednisolone, and mycophenolate were included 2 weeks after transplantation, randomized (1:1) to either computer dosing (MAP-BE) or control (CONTR) and followed for at least 8 weeks. A maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian estimation method, applying a population pharmacokinetic model and the POSTHOC option in nonlinear mixed effects modeling, was used to individualize CsA doses in the MAP-BE group. Forty patients (31 men, 27.5% living donor) between 28 and 80 years were included. A total of 798 CsA concentration measurements and adherent dosing evaluations/adjustments were performed. During the entire study, blood concentrations were on average 10% +/- 5% from the predefined therapeutic target range in the MAP-BE group, as compared with 13% +/- 8% in the CONTR group (P = 0.042). However, there was no significant difference between groups regarding the percentage of CsA concentrations truly within the therapeutic windows [MAP-BE: 37% +/- 17%, CONTR: 33% +/- 15% (P = 0.57)] or in CsA dose [MAP-BE: 3.55 +/- 0.8, CONTR: 3.90 +/- 0.9 mg/kg/d (P = 0.26)]. Acute rejections were present in 4 and 3 patients, respectively (P = 1.00). The computer-assisted TDM-targeted CsA blood concentrations significantly better than experienced transplant physicians. A possible favorable effect on short- and long-term outcome needs to be verified in further, properly powered, clinical trials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181d3f822 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Surg
January 2025
Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix.
Importance: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been shown to reduce peritransplant complications. Despite increasing NMP use in liver transplant (LT), there is a scarcity of real-world clinical experience data.
Objective: To compare LT outcomes between donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts preserved with NMP or static cold storage (SCS).
Urologie
January 2025
Universitätsklinik für Urologie, Universität Bern, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Schweiz.
Background: Recent studies have also shown that clinical monitoring of quality of life (HRQoL) helps to recognize kidney transplant failure at an early stage.
Objectives: Given the potential of improving HRQoL for the long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation, we conducted a rapid review of the last 5 years of quality of life evaluation after adult allogeneic kidney transplantation.
Materials And Methods: A rapid evidence analysis was carried out using a literature search in MEDLINE in the period 2019-2024.
Arch Argent Pediatr
January 2025
Pediatric Nephrology and Renal Transplant Service, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Artif Organs
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease often face prolonged waiting times for kidney transplants. Historically, the use of marginal kidneys was limited due to suboptimal preservation methods. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) preserves physiological activity during the preservation process, potentially improving graft function and viability, expanding the use of marginal kidneys.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Vasc Access
January 2025
Glasgow Renal and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Background: The information and decision support needs required to embed a patient-centred strategy are challenging, as several haemodialysis vascular access strategies are possible with significant differences in short- and long-term outcomes of potential treatment options. We aimed to explore and describe stakeholder perspectives on information needs when making decisions about vascular access (VA) for haemodialysis.
Methods: We performed thematic analysis of seven (six online, one in person) focus group discussions including transcripts, post-it phrases and text responses with 14 patients and 12 vascular access professionals (four nephrologists, three surgeons and five nurses - Vascular access nurse specialists/Education and dialysis nurses) who participated in at total of six online and one in person focus group.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!