The relationship between some soluble osteogenic markers, angiogenic cytokines/other biological parameters and the stages of multiple myeloma evaluated according to the Durie-Salmon and International Prognostic Index stratification systems.

Background: The aim of the present paper was to examine the correlation between serum concentrations of 12 soluble biological markers and stages of myeloma evaluated according to the Durie-Salmon (D-S) and International Prognostic Index (IPI) stratification systems.

Methods: We analyzed a non-pretreated group of 179 patients with MM stratified according to D-S and IPI. Serum levels of soluble biological markers were evaluated using ELISA, REA and quantitative sandwich enzymatic immunoassays. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: The staging system according to D-S revealed a highly significant relationship between all stages (I-III) in case of beta(2)-m (p<0.0001) and sTK (p<0.001), in sICTP a significant difference was found only in stages II vs III (p<0.001) and I vs III (p<0.001), in case of sCD(138) (syndecan-1) in stages I vs II (p = 0.006) and I vs III (p<0.001), in sVEGF only in stages I vs III (p = 0.006). In substages A vs B we found a significant difference in case of beta2-m (p<0.0001), sTK (p = 0.041), sICTP (p 0.0001), sOSP (p = 0.008), sHGF (p<0.001), sCD138 (p = 0.001) and sFas (p= 0.001). The relationship between other factors and stages and substages according to D-S appeared nonsignificant. The IPI system showed a highly significant relationship between all 3 categories (1-3) in case of beta(2)-m (p<0.001), sTK (p<0.0001) and sICTP (p<0.0001), while in sHGF only in stages 2 vs 3 (p<0.0001) and 1 vs 3 (p<0.0001). In 4 parameters there were only discrete differences in 1 vs 3: sPINP (p= 0.036), sOSP (p= 0.002), sCD(138) (p = 0.03) and sFas (p=0.012), in the remaining markers the analysis was negative.

Conclusions: A highly convincing relationship between myeloma stages and serum levels was found only in beta(2)-m, sTK, sICTP and partly also in sCD(138) (syndecan-1) and sHGF. More favourable was the IPI stratification system.