A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Osteogenic capacity of vascularised periosteum: an experimental study on mandibular irradiated bone in rabbits. | LitMetric

Osteogenic capacity of vascularised periosteum: an experimental study on mandibular irradiated bone in rabbits.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

Oral and maxillo-facial surgery department, Hôpital Lapeyronie, 371 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France.

Published: December 2010

Background: Free flaps are presently the best way to treat advanced mandibular ostonecrosis. Nevertheless, the functional and morphological results can be improved. To avoid a mandibular resection, a free periosteal flap was envisioned. In a preliminary study, the authors opted for a pedicled periosteal flap and evaluated the effect of the latter on regeneration of a rabbit irradiated mandibular bone.

Methods: Two bone fragments were taken from the basilar part of the mandible of 15 rabbits through skin incision. Those fragments were then exposed to a 30-Gy irradiation. One bone fragment was implanted in a pedicled periosteal flap elevated from the medial aspect of the femur while the other was subcutaneously fixed as a control. We retrieved the fragments at day 10, 20, 30 and 90 to make a histological analysis without prior decalcification using histomorphometry technique.

Results: In the periosted fragments, an increased osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity as well as neovascularisation evoked intense remodelling. In the subcutaneous fragments, bone resorption was much more important than osteogenesis and vessels were absent.

Conclusion: We have concluded than periosteum, which has already been proven to be efficient in normal bone regeneration, can be just as such efficient in irradiated bone regeneration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.01.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

periosteal flap
12
irradiated bone
8
pedicled periosteal
8
bone regeneration
8
bone
6
fragments
5
osteogenic capacity
4
capacity vascularised
4
vascularised periosteum
4
periosteum experimental
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!