A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation on microbubble destruction volume. | LitMetric

Objective And Motivation: The goal of this work was to test experimentally that exposing air bubbles or ultrasound contrast agents in water to amplitude modulated wave allows control of inertial cavitation affected volume and hence could limit the undesirable bioeffects.

Methods: Focused transducer operating at the center frequency of 10 MHz and having about 65% fractional bandwidth was excited by 3 micros 8.5 and 11.5 MHz tone-bursts to produce 3 MHz envelope signal. The 3 MHz frequency was selected because it corresponds to the resonance frequency of the microbubbles used in the experiment. Another 5 MHz transducer was used as a receiver to produce B-mode image. Peak negative acoustic pressure was adjusted in the range from 0.5 to 3.5 MPa. The spectrum amplitudes obtained from the imaging of SonoVue contrast agent when using the envelope and a separate 3 MHz transducer were compared to determine their cross-section at the -6 dB level.

Results: The conventional 3 MHz tone-burst excitation resulted in the region of interest (ROI) cross-section of 2.47 mm while amplitude modulated, dual-frequency excitation with difference frequency of 3 MHz produced cross-section equal to 1.2mm.

Conclusion: These results corroborate our hypothesis that, in addition to the considerably higher penetration depth of dual-frequency excitation due to the lower attenuation at 3 MHz than that at 8.5 and 11.5 MHz, the sample volume of dual-frequency excitation is also smaller than that of linear 3-MHz method for more spatially confined destruction of microbubbles.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2010.02.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dual-frequency excitation
12
mhz
10
amplitude modulated
8
frequency mhz
8
115 mhz
8
mhz transducer
8
excitation
5
dual-high-frequency ultrasound
4
ultrasound excitation
4
excitation microbubble
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!