AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assesses the effectiveness of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with conventional aspiration thrombectomy in treating symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in 74 patients, averaging 61 years old.
  • Outcomes showed that 91% of patients experienced clinical improvement within 48 hours, and at several follow-ups, a significant number had either no thrombus or partial thrombus. However, 38% developed post-thrombotic syndrome over time.
  • The research concludes that this treatment method is effective for lower extremity DVT, leading to positive clinical outcomes and suggesting a high rate of satisfaction among the patients over the long term.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who had undergone a catheter-directed thrombolysis with conventional aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Materials And Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 74 patients (mean age 61 +/- 15) that underwent a catheter-directed thrombolysis with conventional aspiration thrombectomy. A retrieval inferior vena cava (IVC) filter was placed to protect against a pulmonary embolism in 60 patients (81%). Stenting and balloon angioplasty were performed in 37 patients (50%) under the left common iliac vein compression.

Results: Sixty-seven patients (91%) showed a clinical improvement within 48 hours, but seven patients (9%) showed no improvement. Multi detector computerized tomographic venography (MDCT venography) at discharge showed no thrombus in 15 patients (20%) and partial thrombus in 52 (70%). Twenty-eight patients (38%) developed post-thrombotic syndrome at 3.0 +/- 4.2 months postoperatively. Six patients (8%) were admitted due to DVT recurrence at a mean of 5.6 +/- 7.4 months postoperatively. Sixty-nine patients underwent follow up MDCT venography at 5.7 +/- 5.6 months. fifty (72%) of these showed no thrombus, 15 (22%) partial thrombus, and 4 (6%) showed obstruction. Twenty-eight of 61 (46%) were asymptomatic, twenty-eight (46%) had moderate improvement, and four (6%) were mildly improved by a telephone interview (81%) at 22.8 +/- 10.7 months postoperatively.

Conclusion: Catheter-directed thrombolysis with conventional aspiration thrombectomy is an effective treatment for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and produces satisfactory clinical results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2824863PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2010.51.2.197DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

catheter-directed thrombolysis
16
thrombolysis conventional
16
conventional aspiration
16
aspiration thrombectomy
16
deep vein
16
lower extremity
12
extremity deep
12
vein thrombosis
12
+/- months
12
patients
10

Similar Publications

Background: The recently published PEERLESS trial compared catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, it included a low proportion of patients with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy (4.4%), leaving uncertainty about how CDT would perform relative to CBT in a real-world cohort with higher bleeding risk.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most frequent cause of acute cardiovascular presentation after myocardial infarction and stroke. The treatment approach for PE consists of hemodynamic and respiratory support, anticoagulation, reperfusion treatment, and vena cava filters. Reperfusion treatment consists of systemic thrombolysis (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, streptokinase, and urokinase); percutaneous catheter-directed therapy (CDT); and surgical embolectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In-hospital outcomes of acute aortic occlusion treated by endovascular intervention: A single center study.

Vascular

December 2024

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Harapan Kita National Cardiovascular Center, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Background: Endovascular intervention by means of thrombolysis is emerging as a promising management of Acute Aortic Occlusion (AAO). This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy for AAO cases in a single-center tertiary hospital in Indonesia.

Methods: We review retrospectively AAO patients treated by Rheolytic thrombectomy ± stenting or TEVAR at our referral center from 2011 to 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) has a high mortality rate, particularly due to right heart failure in intermediate to high-risk patients, with current guidelines advocating for thrombolytic therapy in high-risk cases.
  • Despite the recommendations, thrombolytic therapy is not commonly used due to risks like intracranial hemorrhage, and there's still uncertainty about the best treatment for intermediate-risk patients.
  • New endovascular interventions, such as various types of thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, show promise in improving heart function and reducing bleeding risks, prompting future research to better identify patients who would benefit from these treatments and enhance long-term outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Early mortality rate in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism(PE) is extremely high. Prompt and effective reduction of the thrombus load, and restoration of pulmonary circulation may successfully treat such patients. For patients with hemodynamic instability and high-risk acute PE, the guidelines recommend catheter directed therapy (CDT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!