Pushed monocanalicular intubation: a preliminary report.

J Fr Ophtalmol

Department of Ophthalmology, Hôtel-Dieu de Paris, University of Paris VI Medical School, Paris, France.

Published: March 2010

Objective: To study the behavior of a "pushed" monocanalicular stent by means of nasal endoscopy.

Patients And Methods: Four children (six affected sides) with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction were treated with monocanalicular intubation with an anchoring plug. The children's mean age at the time of the operation was 33 months (range, 30-37 months). The procedure began with probing in order to verify (a) dacryostenosis (simple or extensive nasolacrimal duct impatency) and (b) the metal-to-metal contact in the lower nasal meatus. The stent was similar to a Monoka(TM), but the guide (a malleable stainless steel probe) is located inside the silicone stent rather than projecting from it. The silicone's total length is 40 mm and the external diameter 0.96 mm. Simultaneously, the guide acts to catheterize the nasolacrimal duct by pushing the silicone through the upper and lower parts of the outflow system. The guide is removed via a punctal approach. This mode of intubation dispenses with the nasal recovery step. Nasal endoscopy was used to monitor (a) the position of the stent in the lower nasal meatus (free or submucosal), (b) mucosal damage and bleeding, and (c) the behavior of the silicone tube during removal of the guide.

Results: Because of the complexity of nasolacrimal ducts, two of the six sides were treated with the classical Monoka intubation method of pulling the silicone tubing out from the nasal exit of the duct (the pull technique). The pushed intubation method was used for the four simple nasolacrimal stenoses, with no problems whatsoever. In all four cases, endoscopic examination showed (a) no submucosal tunneling (false passage), (b) no noteworthy mucosal damage, and (c) no retraction (bunch-up) of the silicone tube during the metal guide removal. No particular complications were reported during the procedure or the intubation period, which lasted an average of 3 weeks. The stents were removed in the consulting room. Tearing ceased during the 1(st) week in two cases, during the intubation period. Tearing persisted throughout the intubation period in the other two cases, but ceased during the week following stent removal. The follow-up lasted 2 months.

Conclusions: The pushed procedure simplifies monocanalicular nasal intubation. Its indications remain to be determined.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2010.01.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasolacrimal duct
12
intubation period
12
intubation
9
monocanalicular intubation
8
lower nasal
8
nasal meatus
8
mucosal damage
8
silicone tube
8
intubation method
8
nasal
7

Similar Publications

Aim: This research was designed to make a comparison of the treatment outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) in nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) with and without chronic dacryocystitis.

Methods: NLDO (obstruction group) and chronic dacryocystitis (dacryocystitis group) patients treated with En-DCR in the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from March 2021 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to CT dacryocystography, patients in each group were assigned into the high obstruction group (obstruction located in the lacrimal sac) and the low obstruction group (obstruction located at or below the junction of the nasolacrimal duct and dacryocystis).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Dacryocystitis (DC) is a disease most often caused by an obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct, leading to over-accumulation of tears in the lacrimal sac, epiphora, and aseptic inflammation. External and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) aims to restore the tear pathway by creating a bypass from the lacrimal sac to the nose. The aim of this study is to investigate superior nasal septal deviation as a possible contributing factor in the incidence and treatment of dacryocystitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Addressing oculoplastic conditions in the preoperative period ensures both the safety and functional success of any ophthalmic procedure. Some oculoplastic conditions, like nasolacrimal duct obstruction, have been extensively studied, whereas others, like eyelid malposition and thyroid eye disease, have received minimal or no research.

Aim: To investigate the current practice patterns among ophthalmologists while treating concomitant oculoplastic conditions before any subspecialty ophthalmic intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) is a condition in which tear ducts are blocked, leading to epiphora and dacryocystitis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to measure the ability of transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy (TC-DCR) as an alternative approach to PANDO compared to traditional external dacryocystorhinostomy (EX-DCR).

Methods: Our search included Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare the nasolacrimal and nasal anatomical parameters in cases of acquired primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction and acute dacryocystitis.

Methods: The study included 62 eyes of 31 patients. The eyes were divided into three groups: Group A, comprising eyes presenting with acute dacryocystitis; Group B, comprising eyes with nasolacrimal duct obstruction but no previous episodes of dacryocystitis; and Group C, comprising eyes with an patent nasolacrimal duct.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!