Background: Optimal treatment of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction observed in patients after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair is unclear. Studies of biventricular (BiV) stimulation in patients with congenital heart disease have been retrospective or have included patients with heterogeneous disorders.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects on cardiac function of stimulating at various cardiac sites in an animal model of RV dysfunction and dyssynchrony and in eight symptomatic adults with repaired TOF.

Methods: Pulmonary stenosis and regurgitation as well as RV scars were induced in 15 piglets to mimic repaired TOF. The hemodynamic effects of various configurations of RV and BiV stimulation were compared with sinus rhythm (SR) 4 months after surgery. In eight adults with repaired TOF, RV and left ventricular (LV) dP/dt(max) were measured invasively during SR, apical RV stimulation, and BiV stimulation.

Results: At 4 months, RV dilation, dysfunction, and dyssynchrony were present in all piglets. RV stimulation caused a decrease in LV function but no change in RV function. In contrast, BiV stimulation significantly improved LV and RV function (P < .05). Echocardiography and epicardial electrical mapping showed activation consistent with right bundle branch block during SR and marked resynchronization during BiV stimulation. In patients with repaired TOF, BiV stimulation increased significantly RV and LV dP/dt(max) (P < .05).

Conclusion: In this swine model of RV dysfunction and in adults with repaired TOF, BiV stimulation significantly improved RV and LV function by alleviating electromechanical dyssynchrony.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129748PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.11.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biv stimulation
24
repaired tof
16
adults repaired
12
left ventricular
8
tetralogy fallot
8
stimulation
8
stimulation patients
8
model dysfunction
8
dysfunction dyssynchrony
8
stimulation improved
8

Similar Publications

The current gold standard in device therapy for advanced heart failure (HF), which has been firmly established in HF management for more than 25 years, is classical biventricular pacing (BiV-CRT). In the last decade, a new pacing modality called conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as a variant for advanced cardiac device therapy. It provides pacing with preserved intrinsic cardiac activation by direct stimulation of the specific cardiac conduction system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Triple-chamber cardiac devices are the standard treatment for heart failure patients, employing biventricular pacing with a right ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
  • Research indicates that the position of the right ventricular lead does not influence the effectiveness of CRT, and excessive right ventricular pacing can negatively impact heart function when the patient has normal conduction.
  • The study aims to explore leadless left ventricle fusion pacing as a potential alternative to traditional biventricular pacing, especially for nonischemic heart failure patients with preserved atrioventricular conduction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess the safety and feasibility of low-dose, novel, allogenic mesenchymal precursor cell (MPC) therapy as an adjunct to left ventricular (LV) recruitment for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and borderline left ventricles. MPC injections into the hypoplastic left ventricle may stimulate neovascularization and beneficial LV remodeling and may improve the likelihood of achieving biventricular (BiV) or 1.5 ventricle (1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Left bundle branch area pacing reduces epicardial dispersion of repolarization compared with biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Heart Rhythm

December 2023

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Background: Biventricular endocardial pacing (BiV-endo) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) are novel methods of delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy. These techniques are associated with improved activation times and acute hemodynamic response compared with conventional biventricular epicardial pacing (BiV-epi); however, the effects on repolarization and arrhythmic risk are unknown.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of temporary BiV-epi, BiV-endo, and LBBAP on epicardial left ventricular (LV) repolarization using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The noninferiority of left ventricular pacing alone (LVp) compared with biventricular pacing (BIV) has not been yet definitely documented. In this study, we reviewed all the original echocardiographic measures of the Biventricular versus Left Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients (B-LEFT HF) trial in order to investigate mechanisms underlying LV remodelling with both pacing modalities.

Methods: Patients with New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA) III or IV despite optimal medical therapy, LVEF 35% or less, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) more than 55 mm, QRS duration at least 130 ms were randomized to BIV or LVp for 6 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!