Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Although transobturator tapes (TOT) have been suggested to be equivalent to retropubic tension-free vaginal tapes (TVT) in the management of urodynamic stress incontinence, there is very little evidence for their use in women with mixed incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the TOT against the retropubic TVT in women with mixed incontinence.
Patients And Methods: A case controlled study was used with 34 women matched for age and type of procedure.
Results: Ten out of 34 (29.4%) patients in the TOT group required a repeat continence procedure versus 0/34 (0%) in the retropubic group. Patients who had undergone a TOT were significantly more likely to require repeat surgery (odds ratio 10.1, 95% confidence interval 2.6-38.2).
Conclusions: This study suggests a higher failure rate in women undergoing a TOT for USI and DO compared to a retropubic TVT when assessed with a case controlled study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1115-3 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!