Individual drug sampling does not supplant the need for head-to-head trials in dermatology.

J Am Acad Dermatol

Department of Dermatology, and Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94143-0316, USA.

Published: June 2010

A growing body of evidence has highlighted several risks and benefits associated with in-office sampling of prescription medications. While use-testing dermatologic medications from a sample closet may benefit some patients, it seems that the stunning lack of head-to-head trials comparing therapeutic options is a much larger and more important impediment to our determination of when the increased cost of newer agents is justified by superior efficacy, safety, or tolerability. If physicians are to retain the critical autonomy to make independent prescribing decisions in concert with our individual patients, we must take responsibility to call for and generate the comparative data we need to evaluate therapeutic options.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

head-to-head trials
8
therapeutic options
8
individual drug
4
drug sampling
4
sampling supplant
4
supplant head-to-head
4
trials dermatology
4
dermatology growing
4
growing body
4
body evidence
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!