Objective: To perform conventional and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE) at the same session and compare their effectiveness.
Design: Prospective comparative study.
Setting: University hospital setting.
Patient(s): The study included 335 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia.
Intervention(s): Microdissection TESE was performed to 77 patient with atrophic testes. An additional 258 patients underwent conventional TESE using three incisions on three quadrants of the testis (upper, middle, and lower). Microdissection TESE was performed by enlarging the middle incision vertically when no spermatozoa could be detected using the conventional technique.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Sperm retrieval, fertilization, clinical pregnancy rate (PR), and live birth rate were evaluated. The relation between sperm retrieval rate and FSH level and testis volume was also investigated.
Result(s): Spermatozoa was detected in 33.7% of patients using conventional TESE. The spermatozoa detected increased to 50.8% using microdissection TESE. The increase was statistically significant. In the primary microdissection TESE group, the surgical retrieval rate was 20.8%. The overall sperm retrieval rate was 43.9%. There was a significant relation between the sperm retrieval rate and testis volume, whereas there was no relation between sperm retrieval rate and FSH levels. The overall fertilization rate, clinical PR, and live birth rate were 57.1%, 50.4%, 36.4%, respectively.
Conclusion(s): Conventional TESE combined with microdissection TESE can be used in selected patients. Sperm retrieval rate of TESE can be low in patients with atrophic testes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.008 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Testicular mapping-guided sperm retrieval upfront microTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a comparison of sperm retrieval, pregnancy and live-birth rates.
Transl Androl Urol
December 2024
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Background: Sperm extraction by Microscopic Testicular Sperm Extraction (microTESE) has become the standard of care for sperm retrieval (SR) in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) but is costly and has a 40-50% chance of failure. Fine needle aspiration mapping (FNAM) can be performed prior to microTESE as a predictor of success to reduce the likelihood of failure to retrieve sperm but there is limited evidence that directly compares these methods. The objective of this study was to compare success rate of SR, pregnancy, and live birth rates in men who underwent upfront microTESE versus FNAM.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSuccess Rates of Assisted Reproduction for Men With Cystic Fibrosis.
Pediatr Pulmonol
January 2025
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Background: The vast majority of men with CF (mwCF) are infertile. Improvements in assisted reproductive technology (ART) have made it possible for these patients to become biological fathers.
Methods: Data were examined for all male CF patients attending a large adult CF center over a 23-year period.
Routine Sperm Cryopreservation before Vasectomy Is Not Cost-Effective and Does Not Increase Live Birth Rates Compared to Surgical Sperm Retrieval or Vasectomy Reversal.
Urology
January 2025
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Objectives: To determine if routine pre-vasectomy sperm cryopreservation is more cost-effective than fertility restoration for patients who desire additional children following vasectomy?
Methods: A scoping review was performed to collect published data regarding efficacy and outcomes of cryopreservation, vasectomy reversal, surgical sperm retrieval, and assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Cost data were collected from US-based facilities performing cryopreservation and andrology clinical care. A cost-effectiveness model was generated using TreeAge Pro cost-effectiveness modeling software with three different variations representing a balanced scenario with median expected parameter values, a scenario with assumptions/variables favoring pre-vasectomy cryopreservation, and a scenario favoring fertility restoration.
Artificial intelligence and assisted reproductive technology: A comprehensive systematic review.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
January 2025
Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address:
The objective of this review is to evaluate the contributions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART), focusing on its role in enhancing the processes and outcomes of fertility treatments. This study analyzed 48 relevant articles to assess the impact of AI on various aspects of ART, including treatment efficacy, process optimization, and outcome prediction. The effectiveness of different machine learning paradigms-supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning-in improving ART-related procedures was particularly examined.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
January 2025
Institute of Education in Healthcare and Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Background: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are commonly used in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles to prevent a luteinising hormone (LH) surge during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) prior to planned oocyte retrieval, thus optimising the chances of live birth. We compared the benefits and risks of the different GnRHa protocols used.
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different GnRHa protocols used as adjuncts to COH in women undergoing ART.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!