Background: This study compared the stability of commercially available, rapid-acting insulin in the novel tubeless, skin-adhering Solo insulin pump over 6 days at extreme environmental conditions.

Methods: Forty-eight pumps for each tested analog were loaded with three different insulin lots and operated at 30 U/day (three sets of 12 pumps) and 15 U/day (one set of 12 pumps) with basal/bolus delivery patterns for 6 days under extreme climatic (37 degrees C, 40% relative humidity) and mechanical (35 strokes/min) stresses. The insulin solutions dispensed were sampled periodically and analyzed for potency, related substances, high molecular weight proteins (HMWP), and preservative content by high-performance liquid chromatography techniques. Biological activity (bioidentity) was demonstrated by an abrupt decrease in blood glucose in rabbits. Solutions were inspected for visual appearance and measured for pH levels.

Results: During the 6-day sampling period, the potency of all insulin samples was maintained at 95.0-105.0% of the bulk solution concentration of the insulin vials. The levels of HMWP and related substances remained well below labeling limits. The preservative concentration decreased with time but remained bacteriostatic effective. Solutions maintained pH and clarity and were particulate free. The biological activity was verified.

Conclusions: Insulin analogs lispro, aspart, and glulisine maintained physical, chemical, and biological properties for 6 days when used in the Solo MicroPump device.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825630PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/193229681000400113DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lispro aspart
8
aspart glulisine
8
solo micropump
8
insulin
8
insulin pump
8
days extreme
8
biological activity
8
compatibility insulin
4
insulin lispro
4
glulisine solo
4

Similar Publications

Background: Type 1 diabetes is a serious, chronic disorder with an increasing incidence among children and adolescents. Glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes is better managed through a basal-bolus regimen with either regular human or rapid-acting insulin analogues administered as a bolus at mealtimes. Rapid-acting insulin analogues have been hypothesized to cause optimal glycemic control and less risk of hypoglycemic episodes compared to regular human insulins.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: Insulin is essential for treating type 1 diabetes and insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes.

Background/objectives: Diabetes is a widespread condition that can lead to multiple and severe complications. Rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAIAs) and long-acting insulin analogs are prescribed for the effective management of diabetes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultra-rapid-acting insulin with the Boost and Ease-off features of the Cambridge hybrid closed-loop system.

Methods: A secondary analysis of Boost and Ease-off from two double-blind, randomized, crossover hybrid closed-loop studies comparing (1) Fiasp to insulin aspart (n = 25), and (2) Lyumjev to insulin lispro (n = 26) was carried out. Mean glucose on initialization of Boost and Ease-off, change in glucose 60 and 120 minutes after initialization, duration and frequency of use, mean glucose, and time in, above, and below target glucose range were calculated for periods of Boost use, Ease-off use, or neither.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!