Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The uniformity of film development was investigated for eight different film developing methods including both hand and machine processes. Film uniformity was quantitated through microdensitometry by scanning rolls of uniformly fogged and developed film with an Olympus MMSP microspectrophotometer and a Photometrics EDP scanning microscope. The results of this study showed that significant differences of uniformity were produced using the different developing methods evaluated. With the exception of the tray and hand brushing method, all the machine processors studied produced films having significantly better uniformity than any hand methods evaluated.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.15.001276 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!