Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We investigated ERP and fMRI correlates of anticipatory preparation and response inhibition in a cued task-switching paradigm with informatively cued, non-informatively cued and no-go trials. Cue-locked ERPs showed evidence for a multicomponent preparation process. An early cue-locked differential positivity was larger for informative vs. non-informative cues and its amplitude correlated with differential activity for informatively vs. non-informatively cued trials in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), consistent with a goal activation process. A later differential positivity was larger for informatively cued switch vs. repeat trials and its amplitude correlated with informatively cued switch vs. repeat activity in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), compatible with a category-response (C-R) rule activation process. No-go trials elicited a frontal P3, whose amplitude was negatively correlated with activity in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and basal ganglia motor network, suggesting that a network responsible for response execution was inhibited in the course of a no-go trial. These findings indicate that anticipatory preparation in task-switching is comprised of at least two processes: goal activation and C-R rule activation. They also support a functional dissociation between DLPFC and VLPFC, with the former involved in top-down biasing and the latter involved in response inhibition.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.090 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!