The TORCH and UPLIFT studies are probably the most ambitious clinical trials performed to date in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Unfortunately, the main objectives were not achieved. Compared with placebo, combination therapy with salmeterol and fluticasone did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality, nor did tiotropium slow lung function deterioration over 4 years. However, careful analysis of the results reduces the initial disappointment to a minimum and leads to moderate optimism, as both trials showed a decrease in the number of exacerbations, improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and, in general, a good safety profile throughout the studies. Moreover, some benefits on survival were noted. This latter observation opens new horizons as it suggests that, apart from lung function, there are other therapeutic targets with prognostic importance. When analyzed overall, the UPLIFT and TORCH studies confirm and highlight the key role of prolonged action bronchodilators in the management of COPD. Although inhaled corticosteroids, administered in monotherapy, reduce exacerbations and improve HRQoL, these drugs show no benefit on survival and increase the risk of adverse effects. Nevertheless, when inhaled corticosteroids are associated with bronchodilator treatment, their benefits seem to be enhanced.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-2896(09)72950-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

torch uplift
8
bronchodilator treatment
8
chronic obstructive
8
obstructive pulmonary
8
lung function
8
inhaled corticosteroids
8
[impact efficacy
4
efficacy mortality
4
studies
4
mortality studies
4

Similar Publications

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has remained a leading cause of death worldwide and is expected to increase its burden on the healthcare system in the coming future. Numerous clinical trials have been conducted over the years and as a result, many drugs became a part of the treatment protocols of COPD. Currently, there are also several drugs under development.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) results from a permanent and progressive destruction of the airways leading to poor lung function. NCFB is characterized by recurrent lung infection, sputum production, and cough, often requiring long-term antibiotic therapy and hospitalization. At present, there are no approved therapies available.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To validate outcomes of presently available chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) cost-effectiveness models against results of two large COPD trials-the 3-year TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health (TORCH) trial and the 4-year Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT) trial.

Methods: Participating COPD modeling groups simulated the outcomes for the placebo-treated groups of the TORCH and UPLIFT trials using baseline characteristics of the trial populations as input. Groups then simulated treatment effectiveness by using relative reductions in annual decline in lung function and exacerbation frequency observed in the most intensively treated group compared with placebo as input for the models.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in clinical trials and in a population-based study.

Sleep Breath

September 2015

Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Institute of Sports Medicine of the State of Salzburg, Sports Medicine of the Olympic Center Salzburg-Rif, Lindhofstr. 20, 5020, Salzburg, Austria,

Purpose: Evidence-based medicine promotes the current best evidence from clinical trials to guide decisions for individual patients. We assessed whether chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients included in exercise training studies and pharmacologic trials match those from a non-selected COPD target population sample.

Methods: Exercise training studies were identified in a literature search.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Guideline recommendations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are based on the results of large pharmaceutically-sponsored COPD studies (LPCS). There is a paucity of data on disease characteristics at the primary care level, while the majority of COPD patients are treated in primary care.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the external validity of six LPCS (ISOLDE, TRISTAN, TORCH, UPLIFT, ECLIPSE, POET-COPD) on which current guidelines are based, in relation to primary care COPD patients, in order to inform future clinical practice guidelines and trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!