Background: Subfascial breast augmentation, first performed by Dr. Ruth Graf in 1998, places the implant above the pectoralis muscle but below the pectoralis fascia. Graf documented that this approach resulted in less capsular contracture than subglandular implant placement and a more natural shape while eliminating implant animation with arm movement. In addition, implant edge visibility was decreased compared with subglandular implantation in all but the extremely thin patient. Because of the described benefits and high patient satisfaction, the authors began to perform this technique in 2006.
Methods: This report presents a comprehensive review of the aforementioned technique by describing a large series of subfascial augmentations (inframammary, periareolar, and endoscopic transaxillary) as primary procedures, secondary procedures, and operations with concurrent use of mastopexy performed by a single surgeon using multiple approaches. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was used in addition to a detailed clinical assessment.
Results: The results of this procedure were reproducible, controllable, and predictable. The study demonstrated a high degree of patient and surgeon satisfaction with few complications, a low rate of capsular contracture, no evidence of breast animation with arm movement, excellent lower pole coverage, and a brief recovery period.
Conclusions: Subfascial breast augmentation is a safe, effective procedure allowing for predictable results with excellent shape and longevity. For the properly selected patient, this approach provides the benefits of subglandular and submuscular placement without the disadvantages associated with each.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9466-1 | DOI Listing |
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
November 2024
Plastic Surgery Department, Hospital Moriah, Member of the Brazilian Society of Plastic Surgery (SBCP), Brazil; International Member of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), USA.
Background: Autogenous fat grafting (AFG) has become a common procedure to optimize aesthetic results in breast augmentation (BA). However, complications or outcomes in reoperative BA remain unclear. This study compared the outcomes or risk factors in reoperative BA with AFG and without AFG.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
January 2025
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Louisville; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Kentucky; and CaloAesthetics Plastic Surgery Center (private practice).
Ann Plast Surg
November 2024
Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Background: Feminizing top surgery, or mammaplasty augmentation, has multiple variables that surgeons can adjust to work synergistically with patient anatomy including plane of implant placement, pocket size, and inframammary fold (IMF) location. In the gender diverse population receiving this procedure to reduce symptoms of gender dysphoria, surgeons should be aware of differing anatomy and surgical approaches for feminizing top surgery.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted using our institution's electronic health record between December 2019 and May 2023 with a minimum follow up period of 12 months.
Objectives: Assess outcomes from the SF TAA technique in a large series of patients who underwent primary and secondary BA.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent BA between 1999 and 2024 was identified. The primary outcome was occurrence of incision and implant/pocket complications.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!