The main objective of this study was to carry out a direct performance comparison among some known types of TLDs-three types of CaSO(4):Dy pellets, sintered Al(2)O(3) pellets, LiF:Mg,Ti (Harshaw TLD-100), CaF(2):Dy (Harshaw TLD-200) and CaF(2):Mn (Harshaw TLD-400)-in the energy and dose ranges of diagnostic radiology beams. Several dosimetric characteristics were evaluated, such as reproducibility, sensitivity, calibration curves, lower dose limits and energy dependence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.01.002 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
diagnostic radiology
8
response materials
4
materials diagnostic
4
radiology radiation
4
radiation beams
4
beams main
4
main objective
4
objective study
4
study carry
4
carry direct
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!