AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study explored the challenges of implementing clinical guidelines for depression in psychiatric care, highlighting the complexities of translating scientific data into practice and the need for effective strategies.
  • - Researchers conducted qualitative interviews and focus groups at two psychiatric clinics in Stockholm, one using active implementation methods and the other relying on mail distribution of guidelines, to gather insights on perceptions of these guidelines.
  • - Key barriers and facilitators identified included organizational resources, individual characteristics of healthcare professionals, and their perceptions of the guidelines, with significant differences in concerns and beliefs between the two clinics regarding guideline compliance.

Article Abstract

Background: Translating scientific evidence into daily practice is complex. Clinical guidelines can improve health care delivery, but there are a number of challenges in guideline adoption and implementation. Factors influencing the effective implementation of guidelines remain poorly understood. Understanding of barriers and facilitators is important for development of effective implementation strategies. The aim of this study was to determine perceived facilitators and barriers to guideline implementation and clinical compliance to guidelines for depression in psychiatric care.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted at two psychiatric clinics in Stockholm, Sweden. The implementation activities at one of the clinics included local implementation teams, seminars, regular feedback and academic detailing. The other clinic served as a control and only received guidelines by post. Data were collected from three focus groups and 28 individual, semi-structured interviews. Content analysis was used to identify themes emerging from the interview data.

Results: The identified barriers to, and facilitators of, the implementation of guidelines could be classified into three major categories: (1) organizational resources, (2) health care professionals' individual characteristics and (3) perception of guidelines and implementation strategies. The practitioners in the implementation team and at control clinics differed in three main areas: (1) concerns about control over professional practice, (2) beliefs about evidence-based practice and (3) suspicions about financial motives for guideline introduction.

Conclusions: Identifying the barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of recommendations is an important way of achieving efficient implementation strategies. The findings of this study suggest that the adoption of guidelines may be improved if local health professionals actively participate in an ongoing implementation process and identify efficient strategies to overcome barriers on an organizational and individual level. Getting evidence into practice and implementing clinical guidelines are dependent upon more than practitioners' motivation. There are factors in the local context, e.g. culture and leadership, evaluation, feedback on performance and facilitation, -that are likely to be equally influential.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2822755PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical guidelines
12
barriers facilitators
12
implementation strategies
12
implementation
11
guidelines
9
implementing clinical
8
qualitative study
8
perceived facilitators
8
facilitators barriers
8
health care
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!