Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Percutaneous coronary interventions are now, three decades after the first balloon angioplasty of the coronary arteries, safe, effective, and most commonly applied method of myocardial revascularization. The first percutaneous coronary intervention without "on-site" cardiac surgery began at the beginning of the nineties of the twentieth century, thanks to the improvement of techniques and materials used for these procedures, as well as the need to make available to citizens in remote areas modern and effective therapy. However, today, after nearly twenty years of application of percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery this issue remains controversial and unresolved. So despite the existence of a large number of interventional cardiology centers without "on-site" cardiac surgery in a large number of countries in which they performed a significant number of elective and primary interventions, the official guidelines of the associations for percutaneous coronary interventions still does not recommend implementation of interventions without the existence of "on -site" cardiac surgery. But, recently the focus shifts from the questions about presence of "on-site" cardiac surgery in the direction of defining criteria for performing percutaneous coronary interventions according to the highest standards regardless of the existence of "on-site" cardiac surgical backup. This review article gives the current view on current attitudes about the organization and implementation of percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgical backup.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!