This work examines the effects on brain stimulation reward (BSR) of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor manipulations in the sublenticular central extended amygdala (SLEAc) and the nucleus accumbens shell (NAc). Fifty-three male Long Evans rats received medial forebrain bundle stimulation electrodes and bilateral injection guide cannulae aimed at either the SLEAc or the NAc. The rate-frequency paradigm was used to assess drug-induced changes in stimulation reward effectiveness and in response rate following 0.50 microl injections of isotonic saline, 5.0mug of SKF38393 (D1 receptor agonist), 2.0 microg of SCH 23390 (D1 blocker), 10.0 microg of quinpirole (D2 agonist) and 3.0 microg of eticlopride (D2 blocker). The drugs were injected both ipsi- and contralateral to the stimulation site. When injected into the NAc none of the drugs affected either the frequency required to maintain half-maximal responding or maximum response rate. D2 receptor blockade in the SLEAc contralateral to the stimulation site significantly but modestly enhanced both the stimulation's reward effectiveness and response rate while D2 receptor agonism decreased responding. Injections into the SLEAc ipsilateral to the stimulation site were ineffective. These results suggest that dopaminergic neurotransmission in the SLEAc is more important to reward processes than is dopamine in the NAc. We align our findings with past work by considering methodological details and a currently hypothesized role for NAc dopamine in learning behaviors that lead to reward capture.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.01.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stimulation reward
12
response rate
12
stimulation site
12
brain stimulation
8
dopamine receptor
8
receptor manipulations
8
extended amygdala
8
nucleus accumbens
8
reward effectiveness
8
effectiveness response
8

Similar Publications

DeepFocus: a transnasal approach for optimized deep brain stimulation of reward circuit nodes.

J Neural Eng

January 2025

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-3815, UNITED STATES.

Objective: Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is an effective technique to modulate brain activity and treat diseases. However, TES is primarily used to stimulate superficial brain regions and is unable to reach deeper targets. The spread of injected currents in the head is affected by volume conduction and the additional spreading of currents as they move through head layers with different conductivities, as is discussed in [1].

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Potential benefits and mechanisms of physical exercise and rTMS in improving brain function in people with drug use disorders.

Gen Hosp Psychiatry

January 2025

Research Centre for Exercise Detoxification, College of Physical Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China. Electronic address:

Improving brain function impairment in people with substance use disorders (PSUD) is considered to be important in regulating their cyclic drug use impulse and relapse behavior. Physical exercise (PE) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may improve brain functional impairment in PSUD, respectively, but few studies have focused on the benefits and mechanisms of the combined use of the two. This editorial presents: 1) Both PE and rTMS alone appear to have positive effects on PSUD's reward system, cognitive function, and emotional regulation to varying degrees.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Individuals avoid spending cognitive effort unless expected rewards offset the perceived costs. Recent work employing tasks that provide explicit information about demands and incentives, suggests causal involvement of the Frontopolar Cortex (FPC) in effort-based decision-making. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we examined whether the FPC's role in motivating effort generalizes to sequential choice problems in which task demand and reward rates vary indirectly and as a function of experience.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recommended Opioid Receptor Tool Compounds: Comparative for Receptor Selectivity Profiles and for Pharmacological Antinociceptive Profiles.

ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci

January 2025

Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.

Opioid agonist ligands bind opioid receptors and stimulate downstream signaling cascades for various biological processes including pain and reward. Historically, before cloning the receptors, muscle contraction assays using isolated organ tissues were used followed by radiolabel ligand binding assays on native tissues. Upon cloning of the opioid G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), cell assays using transfected opioid receptor DNA plasmids became the standard practice including S-GTPγS functional and cAMP based assays.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex reduces opioid addiction in preclinical studies.

Sci Rep

January 2025

Department of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 38, Italia Ave., Ghods St, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, Iran.

Substance Use Disorder (SUD) is a medical condition where an individual compulsively misuses drugs or alcohol despite knowing the negative consequences. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has been implicated in various types of SUDs, including nicotine, heroin, and alcohol use disorders. Our research aimed to investigate the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the ACC as a potential therapeutic approach for morphine use disorder.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!