Objective: To select parameters that can predict which patients should receive abdominal computed tomography (CT) after high-energy blunt trauma.
Summary Background Data: Abdominal CT accurately detects injuries of the abdomen, pelvis, and lumbar spine, but has important disadvantages. More evidence for an appropriate patient selection for CT is required.
Methods: A prospective observational study was performed on consecutive adult high-energy blunt trauma patients. All patients received primary and secondary surveys according to the advanced trauma life support, sonography (focused assessment with sonography for trauma [FAST]), conventional radiography (CR) of the chest, pelvis, and spine and routine abdominal CT. Parameters from prehospital information, physical examination, laboratory investigations, FAST, and CR were prospectively recorded for all patients. Independent predictors for the presence of > or =1 injuries on abdominal CT were determined using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results: A total of 1040 patients were included, 309 had injuries on abdominal CT. Nine parameters were independent predictors for injuries on CT: abnormal CR of the pelvis (odds ratio [OR], 46.8), lumbar spine (OR, 16.2), and chest (OR, 2.37), abnormal FAST (OR, 26.7), abnormalities in physical examination of the abdomen/pelvis (OR, 2.41) or lumbar spine (OR 2.53), base excess <-3 (OR, 2.39), systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg (OR, 3.81), and long bone fractures (OR, 1.61). The prediction model based on these predictors resulted in a R of 0.60, a sensitivity of 97%, and a specificity of 33%. A diagnostic algorithm was subsequently proposed, which could reduce CT usage with 22% as compared with a routine use.
Conclusions: Based on parameters from physical examination, laboratory, FAST, and CR, we created a prediction model with a high sensitivity to select patients for abdominal CT after blunt trauma. A diagnostic algorithm was proposed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cfd342 | DOI Listing |
Acta Orthop
January 2025
Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Background And Purpose: Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in childhood aims to prevent curve progression. It is generally accepted that curves > 50° have the highest risk of progression, but less well described is what happens with mild to moderate curves. The aim of this study was to assess long-term curve progression and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and compare thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSpine (Phila Pa 1976)
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
January 2025
Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Study Design: Prospective cohort study.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the durability of postural stability after ASD correction surgery and its' association with clinical outcomes.
Summary Of Background Data: The prevalence of symptomatic adult spinal deformity (ASD) necessitates surgical intervention, aiming to correct global spinal balance and spinopelvic parameters.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
January 2025
Shriners Children's Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Study Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected single-center adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) database.
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of single-sided thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) versus bilateral thoracic/thoracolumbar VBT for the treatment of Lenke 1C type curves, as well as the outcomes of Lenke 1A/B curves compared to 1C curves.
Background: Lenke 1C curves can be successfully treated with selective thoracic fusion alone.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
January 2025
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: To investigate evidence on the prevalence and timeline of RTW after lumbar microdiskectomy.
Summary Of Background Data: While lumbar microdiskectomy is a widely used and well-studied procedure, there is lack of evidence on the postoperative prevalence and schedule of return to work after this type of surgery.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!