A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Results of an international comparison of 57Co. | LitMetric

Results of an international comparison of 57Co.

Appl Radiat Isot

Physics Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8462, USA.

Published: August 2010

As part of a Cooperative Research Project (CRP) aimed at improving the state of radioactivity measurement in nuclear medicine, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) organized a comparison of (57)Co solutions among the participants of the project. The comparison solutions were prepared from a single master stock solution and distributed to the participating laboratories, who measured the activity concentration of the solution using either the laboratory's radionuclide activity calibrator or primary standardization methods. A total of 9 sets of results were received, with 5 laboratories reporting results of primary measurements, one reporting results of secondary measurements calibrated against primary standards, and three laboratories reporting values based on measurements in commercial re-entrant ionization chambers using manufacturer-recommended calibration figures. Most of the laboratories reporting primary standardizations also provided results from secondary standardizations. The Comparison Reference Value was calculated from the mean of the five primary standardizations and was found to be 35.54 MBq g(-1), with a standard deviation of the mean of 0.17 MBq g(-1). Degrees of equivalence were calculated for each reporting laboratory and demonstrated that equivalence to within about 4% could be achieved, even in the case of those laboratories that used instruments calibrated by third parties.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.12.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laboratories reporting
12
comparison 57co
8
reporting primary
8
primary standardizations
8
mbq g-1
8
laboratories
5
primary
5
reporting
5
international comparison
4
57co cooperative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!