In vitro evaluation of Radachlorin sensitizer for photodynamic therapy.

J Photochem Photobiol B

Département Laser, Neurochirurgie, CHU Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France.

Published: February 2010

This paper reports the evaluation of a new photosensitizer, Radachlorin in comparison with one of its well known components but used solely, Chlorin e(6). The photodynamic properties and cell uptake and localisation of the two drugs were compared. In vitro studies were conducted on human adenocarcinoma cells (HT29) and lung carcinoma cell line (A549). Both dyes showed an absorption maximum between 640 and 650 nm, but those absorption peaks are enhanced by interactions with serum, with a shifted maximum at 661 and 664 nm, and much higher absorbance. As Radachlorin is constituted of different products and as photoreactivity is dependent on absorbed light energy, we chose to adapt concentrations so that both drugs had the same absorption at the irradiation wavelength (664 nm) for photoreactivity tests, and express concentrations in optical density at 664 nm. The capacity of the two drugs to generate Reactive Oxygen Species was identical, but on HT29 cells, Radachlorin reaches its optimal LD50 sooner than Chlorin e(6). Radachlorin LD50 on HT29 cells was 0.0251 OD(664 nm) after 2 h and 0.0672 OD(664 nm) for Chlorin e(6) for a 20 J cm(-2) irradiation. Radachlorin gave very similar results on A549 cells, LD50 being 0.05 for 5 J irradiation, and 0.026 for 10 and 20 J cm(-2). Pharmacokinetics using fluorescence showed that, even if Radachlorin quickly crossed HT29 (a human colonic cancer line) cell membrane, cellular distribution evolved from a diffuse cytoplasmic repartition 1 hour after Radachlorin addition to a delimited localisation into organelles all around the nucleus. Radachlorin intracellular fluorescence decreased after 4 h, whereas we did not observe a decrease of Chlorin e(6) intracellular fluorescence for times up to 24 h. In both case, a quick decline was observed as soon as the culture medium was replaced with a drug-free one. Radachlorin appears to be an excellent photosensitizer, with similar phototoxicity to Chlorin e(6) on cell cultures, but with quicker kinetics, which could be an improvement if confirmed on further in vivo studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.11.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radachlorin
10
ht29 cells
8
intracellular fluorescence
8
chlorin
5
vitro evaluation
4
evaluation radachlorin
4
radachlorin sensitizer
4
sensitizer photodynamic
4
photodynamic therapy
4
therapy paper
4

Similar Publications

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most challenging types of cancer with little or no response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to ablate tumors and induce an immune response. In our study, we investigated the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), using the photosensitizer Bremachlorin, in its ability to reduce tumor burden and to sensitize immunologically T-cell high and T-cell low murine PDAC tumors to the ICI that blocks programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment using light that helps kill cancer cells, and it's more effective when a special dye called Bremachlorin is present in the tumor tissue.
  • Scientists used special cameras to see how Bremachlorin spread in the body and found it worked best in the pancreatic tumors about 6 hours after it was given.
  • They also used another dye called IRDye®-800CW to see how well PDT caused the tumors to break down, proving that this method is helpful in treating cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Automatic segmentation of lysosomes and analysis of intracellular pH with Radachlorin photosensitizer and FLIM.

Biochem Biophys Res Commun

May 2024

Ioffe Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 26, Polytekhnicheskaya, St.Petersburg, 194021, Russia.

We report application of the fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) for analysis of distributions of intracellular acidity using a chlorin-e6 based photosensitizer Radachlorin. An almost two-fold increase of the photosensitizer fluorescence lifetime in alkaline microenvironments as compared to acidic ones allowed for clear distinguishing between acidic and alkaline intracellular structures. Clusterization of a phasor plot calculated from fits of the FLIM raw data by two Gaussian distributions provided accurate automatic segmentation of lysosomes featuring acidic contents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The CeYTbF nanoparticles with a CeF hexagonal structure were synthesized using the co-precipitation technique. The average nanoparticle diameter was 14 ± 1 nm. The luminescence decay curves of the CeYTbF nanoparticles (λ = 541 nm, D-F transition of Tb) conjugated with Radachlorin using polyvinylpyrrolidone coating as well as without Radachlorin were detected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Although photophysical properties of Radachlorin photosensitizer (PS) were extensively studied in solutions and cells, no data is available on variations of its characteristics upon binding to serum albumins, which are major transporters in blood and nutrients in cell culture media.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to analyze changes in photophysical properties of Radachlorin molecules upon their binding to human and bovine serum albumins at different microenvironment properties.

Methods: Experiments were performed using time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!